LAPARASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS IN HAMADAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHALAJ A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research Year:2000 | Volume:8 | Issue:30-31 Page(s): 69-74

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,458

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LAPARASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS IN HAMADAN

Author(s)

KHALAJ A.R. | | | | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

According to the high prevalence of cholelithiasis and the low acceptance of surgeons in Iran, we decided to evaluate two methods of close and open cholecystectomy.This is a cross sectional, descriptive and observational study. In this study, 146 patients complained from cholelithiasis with two close and open methods were under operated from 1376-1377 in Ekbatan and Mobasher hospitals in Hamadan. The extracted information form their records are: time of hospitalization, the amount of the analgesic drugs and antibiotic usage, infection incidence, the cause and incidence of conversion that analyzed in statistical manner.Cholelithiasis was more common in women than men (84.9% vs. 15.1%). The time of hospitalization with the close and open methods was 3.4 and 1.7 days, respectively. It indicated that the second group (Laparascopic Cholecystectomy) was discharged earlier, so that more than 50% of the L.C group were hospitalized only for one day. Meanwhile the amount of the analgesic drugs and antibiotic usage demonstrated remarkable reduction. Fever in post operation in L.C group was less than other group. 8.2% of L.C group converted to open cholecystectomy.Three conversion cases were due to adhesion of operative site; one due to dilatation of common bile duct; one to Intraoperative hemorrhage and the last to perforation in intestine to reduce the complication and conversion rate. Increasing the surgeon sexperience is effective.According to the results of this study, L.C is a preferable method for cholecystetomy, even, in our country:It is necessary that all surgeons familiarized to this method and the administrative organizations ought to provide the required facilities for patients.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHALAJ, A.R.. (2000). LAPARASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS IN HAMADAN. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 8(30-31), 69-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/61452/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHALAJ A.R.. LAPARASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS IN HAMADAN. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2000;8(30-31):69-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/61452/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. KHALAJ, “LAPARASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS IN HAMADAN,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 30-31, pp. 69–74, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/61452/en

Related Journal Papers