COMPARISON BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY AND DEFENSE MECHANISMS IN THE MILITARY AND ORDINARY PEOPLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YOUSEFI RAHIM; TOGHYANI ELAHE

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Military Medicine Year:2016 | Volume:18 | Issue:2 Page(s): 207-214

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,574

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY AND DEFENSE MECHANISMS IN THE MILITARY AND ORDINARY PEOPLE

Author(s)

YOUSEFI RAHIM | TOGHYANI ELAHE | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCYQ1

DEFENSE MECHANISMSQ1

MILITARYQ1

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare between PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY and DEFENSE MECHANISMS in MILITARY and non-military individuals.Methods: This research is a case-control study. The study sample is consisted of 100 members (50 MILITARY and 50 non-military) which were randomly selected by cluster sampling method. After the selection and random assignment into 2 groups, Conner-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) and defense style questionnaire (DSQ-40) were used in one stage for 2 groups. For the analyses of the data, multivariate analysis of covariance and SPSS software were used.Results: The results showed that non-military individuals had a higher mean in four immature DEFENSE MECHANISMS; rationalization, devaluation, acting out and autistic fantasy than the MILITARY individuals. In the mature DEFENSE MECHANISMS, the MILITARY individuals had a higher mean than the non-military. In the neuroticism DEFENSE MECHANISMS, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant only in the pseudo-altruism. Also, the MILITARY individuals were higher in PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY than the non-military individuals (p<0.05).Conclusion: The results showed that MILITARY individuals with more PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY generally tend to use more efficacy, mature and adaptive mechanisms for coping.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

YOUSEFI, RAHIM, & TOGHYANI, ELAHE. (2016). COMPARISON BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY AND DEFENSE MECHANISMS IN THE MILITARY AND ORDINARY PEOPLE. JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE, 18(2), 207-214. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/61772/en

Vancouver: Copy

YOUSEFI RAHIM, TOGHYANI ELAHE. COMPARISON BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY AND DEFENSE MECHANISMS IN THE MILITARY AND ORDINARY PEOPLE. JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE[Internet]. 2016;18(2):207-214. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/61772/en

IEEE: Copy

RAHIM YOUSEFI, and ELAHE TOGHYANI, “COMPARISON BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCY AND DEFENSE MECHANISMS IN THE MILITARY AND ORDINARY PEOPLE,” JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/61772/en

Related Journal Papers