مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

822
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EXAMINING THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ARTICLES WRITTEN IN THE FIELD OF VETERANS' QUALITY OF LIFE– A MINI-REVIEW ARTICLE

Pages

  99-105

Abstract

 Background and Aim: The correctness of studies in the field of VETERANS' QUALITY OF LIFE can determine therapeutic planning strategies and services to this group. Regarding the lack of data on the quality of writing in the published papers, the aim of this review was to survey the correctness of the articles written in the field of VETERANS' QUALITY OF LIFE.Methods: In this review study, all the published articles in the field of VETERANS' QUALITY OF LIFE were gathered by searching through online databases such as Science Direct, PubMed, Magiran and SID in 2006 -2016 by using different keywords such as QUALITY OF LIFE, VETERANS, IRAN. After on, the correctness of writing in abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion and references were assessed by 52 indexes. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16 and using descriptive statistics and chi-square.Results: For conducting this study, 30 articles were reviewed. The accuracy of writing were as follows: %39.3 correct, %48.4 relatively correct, and %12.3 incorrect. Incorrect article writing were recorded in abstract %59.7, introduction %57.2, methods and materials %54.2, results %56.9, discussion %76.5, and references% 25.3. Conclusion: There are many mistakes in articles written in the field of VETERANS' QUALITY OF LIFE in. The weakest part of the article was the discussion (%66.5) and the best part was the references (%74.7). Necessary measurements for reducing the mistakes in writing articles could result in increasing the validity of articles and will lead to true study results.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    HEYDARI, ABBAS, & MESHKINYAZD, ALI. (1396). بررسی صحت نگارش مقالات مرتبط با کیفیت زندگی در جانبازان – مقاله مروری کوتاه. مجله طب نظامی, 19(2 ), 99-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/61797/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HEYDARI ABBAS, MESHKINYAZD ALI. بررسی صحت نگارش مقالات مرتبط با کیفیت زندگی در جانبازان – مقاله مروری کوتاه. مجله طب نظامی[Internet]. 1396;19(2 ):99-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/61797/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABBAS HEYDARI, and ALI MESHKINYAZD, “بررسی صحت نگارش مقالات مرتبط با کیفیت زندگی در جانبازان – مقاله مروری کوتاه,” مجله طب نظامی, vol. 19, no. 2 , pp. 99–105, 1396, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/61797/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top