COMPARING QUALITY OF A TELESCOPIC BOOM SPRAYER WITH CONVENTIONAL ORCHARD SPRAYERS IN IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAFARI MALEKABADI A.; SADEGHI M.; ZAKI DIZAJI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST) Year:2016 | Volume:18 | Issue:3 Page(s): 585-599

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

778

Download:

315

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING QUALITY OF A TELESCOPIC BOOM SPRAYER WITH CONVENTIONAL ORCHARD SPRAYERS IN IRAN

Author(s)

JAFARI MALEKABADI A. | SADEGHI M. | ZAKI DIZAJI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ELECTROSTATIC SPRAYERQ3

SIDE PUMP SPRAYERQ3

TELESCOPING BOOMQ3

WHEEL BARROW SPRAYERQ3

Abstract

In small orchards, gardeners face several problems such as irregular tree planting, hard trafficability for tractors, economic problems for buying tractors, high drift in high height sprayers, low height of spraying, and difficulty of working with conventional sprayers. In this study, in order to solve some of these problems, a TELESCOPING BOOM sprayer was designed and fabricated. The sprayer equipped with This Boom (TS) was evaluated in comparison with the conventional sprayers [Wheel Barrow (WBS), Electrostatic (ES), Side Pump (SPS) Sprayers] in terms of drift, spraying quality, solution consumption, fuel consumption, spray height, spraying time, and spray loss. Results showed that the spraying quality coefficient of ES was better than that of SPS; WBS and TS could not be evaluated because the surface of sensitive papers was wetted completely, but distribution of droplets on each card and between the cards was more uniform in TS.Due to differences in drift, WBS had the highest mean of droplet area and TS had the lowest. Also, WBS, TS, SPS, and ES had the maximum amount of solution consumption while ES, TS, and WBS had the minimum. SPS and ES did not spray at high height; however, TS and WBS could spray at high height. The maximum and minimum spraying times were recorded for WBS and SPS, respectively. Values of 9.93 and 2.80 mm2 were obtained for mean spray loss area of SPS and ES, respectively. Spray loss area of the TS and WBS was not calculated.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAFARI MALEKABADI, A., SADEGHI, M., & ZAKI DIZAJI, H.. (2016). COMPARING QUALITY OF A TELESCOPIC BOOM SPRAYER WITH CONVENTIONAL ORCHARD SPRAYERS IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), 18(3), 585-599. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/62516/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAFARI MALEKABADI A., SADEGHI M., ZAKI DIZAJI H.. COMPARING QUALITY OF A TELESCOPIC BOOM SPRAYER WITH CONVENTIONAL ORCHARD SPRAYERS IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST)[Internet]. 2016;18(3):585-599. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/62516/en

IEEE: Copy

A. JAFARI MALEKABADI, M. SADEGHI, and H. ZAKI DIZAJI, “COMPARING QUALITY OF A TELESCOPIC BOOM SPRAYER WITH CONVENTIONAL ORCHARD SPRAYERS IN IRAN,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 585–599, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/62516/en

Related Journal Papers