مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

828
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE OUTCOMES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WITH ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) IN VITRECTOMY CASE

Pages

  2-10

Keywords

ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT)Q2
LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA)Q3
GENERAL ANESTHESIA (GA)Q3

Abstract

  Airway problems are among the most important causes of anesthesia related mortalities and morbidities. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) could provide a reliable airway during anesthesia; moreover, muscle relaxation is not mandatory for its insertion so it could be a proper alternative for Endotracheal Tube (ETT). In this study we compared the outcomes of LMA and ETT.Methods and Materials: Seventy two patients aged 30 to 72 with ASA classification I and II, candidates for VITRECTOMY, entered this single blinded study and allocated into two groups of LMA (32 patients) and ETT (40 patients). Premedication, induction and maintenance was the same for both groups. Blood pressure and heart rate recorded before induction and every five minutes afterward. Nausea, vomiting, sore throat, cough and hoarseness evaluated and recorded in recovery room. Pain measured using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).Results: Heart rate, blood pressure and coughing were not statistically different between two groups. Sore throat and hoarseness was less in LMA group and nausea was more in ETT group which were statistically meaningful.Conclusion: LMA could provide a safe and reliable airway in VITRECTOMY patients with less side effects.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAFARI, FARHAD, NASHIBI, MASOUD, SEZARI, PARISA, & MOTTAGHI, KAMRAN. (2017). COMPARING THE OUTCOMES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WITH ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) IN VITRECTOMY CASE. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 38(2 (98) ), 2-10. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63261/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAFARI FARHAD, NASHIBI MASOUD, SEZARI PARISA, MOTTAGHI KAMRAN. COMPARING THE OUTCOMES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WITH ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) IN VITRECTOMY CASE. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2017;38(2 (98) ):2-10. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63261/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FARHAD SAFARI, MASOUD NASHIBI, PARISA SEZARI, and KAMRAN MOTTAGHI, “COMPARING THE OUTCOMES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) WITH ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) IN VITRECTOMY CASE,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 38, no. 2 (98) , pp. 2–10, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63261/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button