COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM SULFATE ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ETOMIDATE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

POURMEHDI ZAHRA; SOLTANZADEH MANSOUR; SOLTANI FARHAD; LEILATAN JAMILEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

609

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM SULFATE ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ETOMIDATE

Author(s)

POURMEHDI ZAHRA | SOLTANZADEH MANSOUR | SOLTANI FARHAD | LEILATAN JAMILEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ETOMIDATEQ2

LIDOCAINEQ1

MAGNESIUM SULFATEQ3

PAINQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular stability after induction of general anesthesia is the major advantage of ETOMIDATE. The incidence of PAIN on injection is a side effect of using ETOMIDATE.The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of LIDOCAINE versus MAGNESIUM SULFATE on PAIN associated with intravenous administration of ETOMIDATE.Materials and methods: In this clinical trial study, 99 patients undergoing elective surgery aged 18-60 years were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (control) without medication, group 2 received 30 mg of LIDOCAINE 1% and group 3 received 2.48 mMol of MAGNESIUM SULFATE. After 3 minutes, 0.2mg/kg ETOMIDATE was injected. The severity of injection PAIN was immediately evaluated and recorded using the scale of Ambesh et al. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Tukey and Kruskal-Wallis tests by SPSS software version 9.0.Results: The incidence of PAIN in group I (control), regardless of the intensity of PAIN, was 66.67%; in group II (lidocaine) 63.60% and in group III (magnesium sulfate) 45.45%, respectively. PAIN in group II (receiving LIDOCAINE) was lower than in group I (control) (p=0.030) and also lower in Group III (receiving MAGNESIUM SULFATE) as compared to group I (control) (p=0.015). In terms of PAIN at the injection site after receiving LIDOCAINE and MAGNESIUM SULFATE, no significant differences were observed between groups II and III (p=0.325).Conclusion: Patients receiving LIDOCAINE and MAGNESIUM SULFATE had less PAIN on injection with ETOMIDATE compared to the control group. But the PAIN in the MAGNESIUM SULFATE group was lower in the LIDOCAINE group.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

POURMEHDI, ZAHRA, SOLTANZADEH, MANSOUR, SOLTANI, FARHAD, & LEILATAN, JAMILEH. (2015). COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM SULFATE ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ETOMIDATE. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 37(2 (90)), 112-119. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63322/en

Vancouver: Copy

POURMEHDI ZAHRA, SOLTANZADEH MANSOUR, SOLTANI FARHAD, LEILATAN JAMILEH. COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM SULFATE ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ETOMIDATE. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2015;37(2 (90)):112-119. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63322/en

IEEE: Copy

ZAHRA POURMEHDI, MANSOUR SOLTANZADEH, FARHAD SOLTANI, and JAMILEH LEILATAN, “COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM SULFATE ON PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ETOMIDATE,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 37, no. 2 (90), pp. 112–119, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63322/en

Related Journal Papers