COMPARING PATIENT SATISFACTION UNDERGOING COMBINED VS. DISSOCIATIVE ANALGO- SEDATION FOR CATARACT SURGERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAMRANMANESH MOHAMMAD REZA; AGHAMOHAMMADI HOMAYOON; JAFARI ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE Year:2015 | Volume:37 | Issue:4 (92) Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

479

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING PATIENT SATISFACTION UNDERGOING COMBINED VS. DISSOCIATIVE ANALGO- SEDATION FOR CATARACT SURGERY

Author(s)

KAMRANMANESH MOHAMMAD REZA | AGHAMOHAMMADI HOMAYOON | JAFARI ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REMIFENTALINQ3

CATARACT SURGERYQ2

PROPOFOLQ3

PCSQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Regional anesthesia today is the method of choice for the disease in a surgery. In keeping with this type of anesthesia, appropriate sedation reduced patient fear and anxiety and raises the quality of Regional anesthesia. For several years, various methods of Sedation have been used that the substantial progress has made over time. In this study, we have tried to satisfy surgeons and patients during surgery in patients who had received sedation with the Patient Control Sedation (PCS) method.Materials and Methods: In this study, seventy-two patients with ASA class I and II selected who were volunteers for surgery with cataract (feco). Patients were divided into 2 groups of 36 people randomly. First, for each patient, an IV was inserted and 500 cc of normal saline was injected. PROPOFOL at doses of 20 mg/kg/min and Remifentanil at doses 0.02 mg/kg/min administered to patient that start sedation was 5 min before local injection.In case of request of the patient as Bolus with five minutes lock out time, sedation drug included 0.15 mg/kg Remifentanil and 50 mg/kg PROPOFOL injected. According to the training that was given before operation, in separate group if the patient felt pain during the surgery with raising left hand to receive Remifentanil and if felt anxiety with raising right hand received PROPOFOL. Patients in the combination group either pain or anxiety with hands up anyone who received the drug at the same time. Therefore, by failing to inform the patient of the injection, single blind study was conducted.Results: Satisfaction of the surgeon, anesthesia technicians and patients in both methods were non-significant differences in the separate group, the number of requests for analgesic was 2 times more than the number of requesting for sedative. In terms of the number of patients requesting drug and the number of applicants, there was no significant differences between two groups. Although the amount of Remifentanil used in the two groups showed non-significant difference, in the combination group total dose of PROPOFOL was significantly higher than separate group Conclusion: By taking fewer amounts of analgesic and same sedative in both groups, separate groups as the combination group could be an effective way. In terms of the surgeon, patient satisfaction, anesthesia, technicians, and security techniques used in both groups, there was no significant difference.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KAMRANMANESH, MOHAMMAD REZA, AGHAMOHAMMADI, HOMAYOON, & JAFARI, ALIREZA. (2015). COMPARING PATIENT SATISFACTION UNDERGOING COMBINED VS. DISSOCIATIVE ANALGO- SEDATION FOR CATARACT SURGERY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 37(4 (92) ), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63472/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAMRANMANESH MOHAMMAD REZA, AGHAMOHAMMADI HOMAYOON, JAFARI ALIREZA. COMPARING PATIENT SATISFACTION UNDERGOING COMBINED VS. DISSOCIATIVE ANALGO- SEDATION FOR CATARACT SURGERY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2015;37(4 (92) ):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63472/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD REZA KAMRANMANESH, HOMAYOON AGHAMOHAMMADI, and ALIREZA JAFARI, “COMPARING PATIENT SATISFACTION UNDERGOING COMBINED VS. DISSOCIATIVE ANALGO- SEDATION FOR CATARACT SURGERY,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 37, no. 4 (92) , pp. 0–0, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63472/en

Related Journal Papers