A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF HELICAL CT SCAN AND ROUTINE IMAGING MODALITIES (IVP AND RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE FLANK PAIN AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC KUB AND ULTRASONGRAPHIC FINDINGS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAMMADI FALAH MOHAMMAD REZA; ALIZADEH MANSOUR; TAGHIZADEH BAZARGANI S.; SHARAFI A.H.; AFSHARIAN MOHAMMAD; BARADARAN SAFA B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Studies in Medical Sciences Year:2008 | Volume:19 | Issue:2 Page(s): 149-154

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,663

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF HELICAL CT SCAN AND ROUTINE IMAGING MODALITIES (IVP AND RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE FLANK PAIN AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC KUB AND ULTRASONGRAPHIC FINDINGS

Author(s)

Keywords

HELICAL CTQ3

ACUTE FLANK PAINQ3

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY ACCESSQ2

URINARY STONE DISEASEQ3

Abstract

Background & Aims: In this study, we aimed to compare HELICAL CT scan with routine imaging modalities (IVP and/or retrograde pyelography) in patients with ACUTE FLANK PAIN and non-diagnostic findings in KUB and ultrasonography. Materials & Methods: During a five month period, 32 patients referring to the emergency center with ACUTE FLANK PAIN, and having nondiagnostic KUB and ultrasonography were selected for the study. All patients underwent regular diagnostic procedures. IVP and retrograde pyelography were done when necessary and HELICAL CT scan without oral or IV contrast media as well. The results were reported by a radiologist positive and an urologist as well. Results included observation of stone plus its secondary signs. Merely positive secondary signs without finding any stones were considered negative. Any other pathologies resulting in ACUTE FLANK PAIN e.g. UPJO, tumor, and strictures presumed as a positive result as well. Result: Among 32 patients, 25 entered the study, in 7 patients no pathologies were found - stone or other, and the resulting lack of gold-standard made us put them off. Of the remaining 25, five had pathology other than stone. One case was of ureteral stricture with polyp and 4 cases of UPJO. HELICAL CT scan was precise in accurate diagnosis of all 25 patients. In one occasion, the study continued with oral and IV contrast CT. Conclusion: HELICAL CT scan is more accurate than other imaging tools in diagnosing radiolucent stones and other causes of ACUTE FLANK PAIN. Also CT scan can definitely rule out a urologic origin of ACUTE FLANK PAIN. While suspicion remains about causes other than stone, oral, and IV contrast; enhanced CT increases the accuracy. Finally, when there is a contraindication for using contrast media, non-contract HELICAL CT poses as a double value. We propose using non-contrast HELICAL CT as the next step for patient with non-diagnostic KUB and ultra sonograpic findings.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAMMADI FALAH, MOHAMMAD REZA, ALIZADEH, MANSOUR, TAGHIZADEH BAZARGANI, S., SHARAFI, A.H., AFSHARIAN, MOHAMMAD, & BARADARAN SAFA, B.. (2008). A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF HELICAL CT SCAN AND ROUTINE IMAGING MODALITIES (IVP AND RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE FLANK PAIN AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC KUB AND ULTRASONGRAPHIC FINDINGS. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), 19(2), 149-154. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63722/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAMMADI FALAH MOHAMMAD REZA, ALIZADEH MANSOUR, TAGHIZADEH BAZARGANI S., SHARAFI A.H., AFSHARIAN MOHAMMAD, BARADARAN SAFA B.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF HELICAL CT SCAN AND ROUTINE IMAGING MODALITIES (IVP AND RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE FLANK PAIN AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC KUB AND ULTRASONGRAPHIC FINDINGS. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES)[Internet]. 2008;19(2):149-154. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63722/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD REZA MOHAMMADI FALAH, MANSOUR ALIZADEH, S. TAGHIZADEH BAZARGANI, A.H. SHARAFI, MOHAMMAD AFSHARIAN, and B. BARADARAN SAFA, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF HELICAL CT SCAN AND ROUTINE IMAGING MODALITIES (IVP AND RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE FLANK PAIN AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC KUB AND ULTRASONGRAPHIC FINDINGS,” STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63722/en

Related Journal Papers