COMPARISON OF EYEPROTECTION METHODS DURING ANESTHESIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HESHMATI F.; HASANI AFSHAR A.; SOLTANZADEH A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Studies in Medical Sciences Year:2000 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 Page(s): 29-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

10,785

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EYEPROTECTION METHODS DURING ANESTHESIA

Author(s)

HESHMATI F. | HASANI AFSHAR A. | SOLTANZADEH A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CORNEAL ABRTIONQ4

EYE PROTECTIONQ4

ANESTHESIAQ4

Abstract

Introduction: Ophthalmologic complications during ANESTHESIA and operation can cause multiple difficulties for patient in the correct protection of eyes is not observed by anesthesiologist. Corneal abration is the commonest complication. Others consist of foreign body feeling, lacrimation, photophobia and ocular imtation. Probable casuses of this problems are dryness of cornea due to its exposure, iatrogenic trauma due to laryngoscope,face mask, surgical draps and patients position. Methods: during this clinical trial 210 patients in three treatments groups (70 patients in each one) were stduied. In first group leukoplast, in second group ophtalmic ointment and third group wet gas is used for EYE PROTECTION. Patients were evaluated for percents of ophthalmologic complications the day after operation.Results: Ophtalmologic complications occured among 15 patients (7.1%), four cases in leucoplast group, 5 cases in wet gas group and 6 cases in ointment group.Discussion: The results show that the ophthalmologic complications is low after ANESTHESIA and operation using these methods. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between these protective methods. So anesthegialogists can use each one of these methods optionally.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HESHMATI, F., HASANI AFSHAR, A., & SOLTANZADEH, A.. (2000). COMPARISON OF EYEPROTECTION METHODS DURING ANESTHESIA. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), 11(1), 29-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63812/en

Vancouver: Copy

HESHMATI F., HASANI AFSHAR A., SOLTANZADEH A.. COMPARISON OF EYEPROTECTION METHODS DURING ANESTHESIA. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES)[Internet]. 2000;11(1):29-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63812/en

IEEE: Copy

F. HESHMATI, A. HASANI AFSHAR, and A. SOLTANZADEH, “COMPARISON OF EYEPROTECTION METHODS DURING ANESTHESIA,” STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63812/en

Related Journal Papers