مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,408
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CERVIX-BRUSH-COMBI WITH CERVIX- BRUSH FOR COLLECTION OF CERVICAL CELLS IN PAP SMEAR

Pages

  9-18

Abstract

 Introduction: CERVICAL CANCER is one of the important health problems and one of the common gynecologic disease with high mortality rate. This study was performed with the aim to compare the CERVIX-Brush-Combi with CERVIX- BRUSH for collection of cervical cells in PAP SMEAR.Methods: In this quasi experimental study, 100 women referred to health care center No. 2 in east of Ahvaz were randomly divided into two group of code 1 (firstly, CERVIX-Brush-Combi and then CERVIX- BRUSH) and code 2 (firstly, CERVIX- BRUSH and then CERVIX-Brush-Combi). 200 samples were prepared from Endocervix and exocervix, and then, BRUSH''s tip was removed from the trunk and was thrown into the vial with an alcohol base. After the closure of the vial, 20-15 times was shaken and sent to the laboratory. Data was analyzed by SPSS (version 16), and independent t-test and chi-square test. PResults: Mean number of exocervical and endocervical cells collected by CERVIX-Brush-Combi were 63.3±48.0 and 636.3±545.5, respectively and collected by CERVIX- BRUSH were 70.0±62.1 and 607.2±378.8, respectively. Independent t–test and chi-square test were not found significant difference between two tools.Conclusion: CERVIX-brush COMBI tool has the same efficiency and effectiveness in terms of collection of cervical cells compared to the CERVIX BRUSH tool.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAJAR, SHAHNAZ, POURALI, MAHBOUBEH, LATIFI, SAYYED MAHMOOD, YAZDI ZADEH, MASOUD, & AFSHARI, POURANDOKHT. (2014). COMPARISON OF CERVIX-BRUSH-COMBI WITH CERVIX- BRUSH FOR COLLECTION OF CERVICAL CELLS IN PAP SMEAR. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, 17(120), 9-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/64841/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAJAR SHAHNAZ, POURALI MAHBOUBEH, LATIFI SAYYED MAHMOOD, YAZDI ZADEH MASOUD, AFSHARI POURANDOKHT. COMPARISON OF CERVIX-BRUSH-COMBI WITH CERVIX- BRUSH FOR COLLECTION OF CERVICAL CELLS IN PAP SMEAR. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2014;17(120):9-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/64841/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHAHNAZ NAJAR, MAHBOUBEH POURALI, SAYYED MAHMOOD LATIFI, MASOUD YAZDI ZADEH, and POURANDOKHT AFSHARI, “COMPARISON OF CERVIX-BRUSH-COMBI WITH CERVIX- BRUSH FOR COLLECTION OF CERVICAL CELLS IN PAP SMEAR,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, vol. 17, no. 120, pp. 9–18, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/64841/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button