مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

742
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOW RISK GESTATIONAL THROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE

Pages

  51-56

Abstract

 Low risk GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE (LRGTD) has a good prognosis with single-agent chemotherapy. The goal is to offer a safe, effective, inexpensive, inexpensive and convenient therapy for patients with LRGTD. Puls ACTINOMYCIN-D, Puls METHOTREXATE, 5-day ACTINOMYCIN and METHOTREXATE leucovorin were compared on 54 cases of LRGTD in Mirza Kocak Khan Hospital, through a longiudinal study.During 2.5 years study patients received puIs ACTINOMYCIN-D (n-19), puls MTX (n = 13), 5-day ACTINOMYCIN (n = 8), MTX leucovorin (n =15).66.7% (n = 34) achieved remission with first line chemotherapy; remission rate was 100%, and no recurrence was seen after one year of follow up.Primary response rate was 68.8% (n = 11) for puis ACTINOMYCIN, 61.5% (n = 8) for puls MTX, 57.5% (n = 4) for 5-dayActinomycinand 73.3% (n = 11) for MTX and leucovorin. These differences were not significant. The mean time to responses was different among the four groups, with a range of 66-78 days. But the differences were not statistically significant. The mean course of chemotherapy were twice in puls MTX (8.4 ± 1.8) compared with other groups (4.3 ± 1.5) which is significant (p = 0.0001).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    EFTEKHAR, Z., YARANDI, F., & MOGHADDASI, N.. (2001). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOW RISK GESTATIONAL THROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, 3(5-6), 51-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/65284/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    EFTEKHAR Z., YARANDI F., MOGHADDASI N.. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOW RISK GESTATIONAL THROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2001;3(5-6):51-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/65284/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. EFTEKHAR, F. YARANDI, and N. MOGHADDASI, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOW RISK GESTATIONAL THROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, vol. 3, no. 5-6, pp. 51–56, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/65284/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top