A STUDY OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSEINI SHAHROUDI MORTEZA; ESTESNAIE FATEMEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Of Religious Thought Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:43 Page(s): 27-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

697

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

Author(s)

HOSEINI SHAHROUDI MORTEZA | ESTESNAIE FATEMEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WORDS NEGATIVE THEOLOGYQ4

ONTOLOGICAL EXCELLENCEQ4

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTSQ4

Abstract

Those who defend negative theology base their ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS on God's unity, simplicity, being not comparable, lacking of limitation, lacking of quiddity, absoluteness, and infinity. On the other side, those who defend positive theology hold that there is no inconsistency between the above mentioned attributes of God and his positive attributes. For example, they say, we can accept both his unity of essence and his multiplicity of attributes. Also we can attribute him positively from one side and accept his incomparability from the other side. Also there is not any implication between having description and being limited. There is no inconsistency between an absolute God and the God of religions, All of these are derived from confusing general knowledge and detailed knowledge of God. We will discuss that most of these criticisms do not apply to negative theology and that the critics have not a clear concept of this theology in their minds.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSEINI SHAHROUDI, MORTEZA, & ESTESNAIE, FATEMEH. (2012). A STUDY OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, -(43), 27-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/66512/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSEINI SHAHROUDI MORTEZA, ESTESNAIE FATEMEH. A STUDY OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT[Internet]. 2012;-(43):27-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/66512/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA HOSEINI SHAHROUDI, and FATEMEH ESTESNAIE, “A STUDY OF ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY,” JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, vol. -, no. 43, pp. 27–54, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/66512/en

Related Journal Papers