A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN'S FREE WILL FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF LINDA ZAGZEBSKI AND MORTAZA MUTAHHARI

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL; AMIRI ZEINAB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Of Religious Thought Year:2014 | Volume:14 | Issue:3 (52) Page(s): 1-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

715

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN'S FREE WILL FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF LINDA ZAGZEBSKI AND MORTAZA MUTAHHARI

Author(s)

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL | AMIRI ZEINAB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGEQ2

FREE WILLQ2

THOMISTIC OCKHAMISMQ2

LINDA ZAGZEBSKIQ2

MORTAZA MUTAHHARIQ2

PREDESTINATIONQ2

Abstract

The problem of DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE and the human FREE WILL is one of the important issues of philosophy of religion. According to this problem, since the divine Omniscience requires its infallibility; therefore, if at a time t1 God knows that subject (S) will have an action A at a time t3, then S cannot do anything other than this action at time t3. So, DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE is in an apparent contradiction to the human FREE WILL. This article tries to compare the views of LINDA ZAGZEBSKI (the contemporary religion philosopher) with those of MORTAZA MUTAHHARI on this topic. We first address the classic triple responses to this issue (Bothiusism, Ockhamism, Mollinism) from the viewpoint of ZagzEbski. Then we show that Zagzebski, while admitting parts of the elements of these viewpoints and integrating them, presents three novel solutions. Then the article addresses the viewpoints of Mutahhari in the fields of determination, FREE WILL and PREDESTINATION. Finally we show the similarities and differences of these two views. The research findings are that both intellectuals admit the compatibility of DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE and human FREE WILL, but THOMISTIC OCKHAMISM and two other solutions of Zagzebski, in spite of their positive and admissible points, are not successful in demonstrating this compatibility, while the solution of Mutahhri is successful.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KASHFI, ABDOLRASOOL, & AMIRI, ZEINAB. (2014). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN'S FREE WILL FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF LINDA ZAGZEBSKI AND MORTAZA MUTAHHARI. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, 14(3 (52)), 1-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/66534/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL, AMIRI ZEINAB. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN'S FREE WILL FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF LINDA ZAGZEBSKI AND MORTAZA MUTAHHARI. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT[Internet]. 2014;14(3 (52)):1-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/66534/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLRASOOL KASHFI, and ZEINAB AMIRI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD'S FOREKNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN'S FREE WILL FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF LINDA ZAGZEBSKI AND MORTAZA MUTAHHARI,” JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, vol. 14, no. 3 (52), pp. 1–30, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/66534/en

Related Journal Papers