مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,649
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

KEY SELECTION CRITERIA OF E-LEARNING AUTHORING TOOLS

Pages

  75-89

Abstract

 Because of growth of the internet, reduced barriers to accessing and using the internet and increased innovations in the area of information and communication technology, Web-based education are continuously being broadened. Creation and management of instructional content is the major hazard in E-LEARNING industry. Also, individualized contents should be provided considering social, cultural and pedagogical characteristics of the learners. Individual interests, learning styles and prior knowledge are also momentous criteria to be considered. In the recent years, features and capabilities of AUTHORING TOOLs have been drastically improved. Concepts such as "adapting to the needs of learners" and "personalized content" not only make AUTHORING TOOLs to play a more prominent role in the process of creating learning contents but also promise the emergence of a new generation of AUTHORING TOOLs with prominent potentials and capabilities. In this paper we attempt to outline the importance of AUTHORING TOOLs in the performance of E-LEARNING systems. Therefore, capabilities and limitations of current available AUTHORING TOOLs are comparatively studied. These comparisons' are based on criteria such as compatibility with E-LEARNING standards, the amount of time and cost needed for the instructional design and potential features. The outcomes of the study would certainly be of significant help with enhancing the decision making procedure for managers and presidents of learning areas, which maybe overwhelmed by all the technology decisions they have to make, the number of choices available, and the terminology they may not be familiar with. These outcomes would basically lead to determining basic factors of learner satisfaction and therefore improving educational performance.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TAGHI YAREH, F., & SIADAT, M.. (2007). KEY SELECTION CRITERIA OF E-LEARNING AUTHORING TOOLS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 13(1 (43)), 75-89. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68049/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TAGHI YAREH F., SIADAT M.. KEY SELECTION CRITERIA OF E-LEARNING AUTHORING TOOLS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION[Internet]. 2007;13(1 (43)):75-89. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68049/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. TAGHI YAREH, and M. SIADAT, “KEY SELECTION CRITERIA OF E-LEARNING AUTHORING TOOLS,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 13, no. 1 (43), pp. 75–89, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68049/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button