مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,676
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES TO DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SUPERVISOR SELECTION

Pages

  47-66

Abstract

 Dissertation SUPERVISOR SELECTION is one of the most important and crucial decisions in doctoral programs. Typically, selection process is based on a set of criteria such as supervisors’ reputation, number of dissertations guided, continues supervision, etc. However, the application of these criteria is often subjective and intuitive and it can cause dissatisfaction, delay on completion time, and quality reduction of dissertations. This article proposes a new model for doctoral dissertation SUPERVISOR SELECTION by using multi criteria decision making (MCDM) method. In order to identify the key criteria, a review of literature and purposive sampling were used. By means of purposive sampling 37 senior DOCTORAL STUDENTS of Tarbiat Modarres University were selected and key criteria were identified through a questionnaire. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach were utilized for prioritization and identification of criteria’s level of importance. The finding showed significant differences between priority expectations of sample and selected sample. In addition, the findings revealed that supervisor’s reputation was first priority for the sample and continuous supervision was main concern for selected sample.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SALEHI OMRAN, EBRAHIM, AGHDAIE, MOHAMMAD HASAN, & HASHEMKHANI ZOLFANI, SARFARAZ. (2012). USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES TO DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SUPERVISOR SELECTION. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 18(3 (65)), 47-66. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68075/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SALEHI OMRAN EBRAHIM, AGHDAIE MOHAMMAD HASAN, HASHEMKHANI ZOLFANI SARFARAZ. USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES TO DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SUPERVISOR SELECTION. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION[Internet]. 2012;18(3 (65)):47-66. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68075/en

    IEEE: Copy

    EBRAHIM SALEHI OMRAN, MOHAMMAD HASAN AGHDAIE, and SARFARAZ HASHEMKHANI ZOLFANI, “USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES TO DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SUPERVISOR SELECTION,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PLANNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 18, no. 3 (65), pp. 47–66, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68075/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button