مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,056
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FASCIAL FLAP AND VEIN CONDUIT FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY REPAIR IN RATS

Pages

  76-81

Abstract

 Background: Peripheral nerve injures are common in clinical practice that includes from compression injury to complete disruption of nerve trunk. After injury nerves can grow and repair spontaneously, early end to end anastomosis is first choice for repair but only 50% of nerve fiber would be physiologically accurate and effective, thus several techniques for repair of nerve injury are introduced including combination of nerve transplant with silicon tubes, use of biologic and synthetic tubes for nerve conduit.Materials and Methods: In this Exprimental study, 20 RATs with the same weight were selected and kept in the same condition. The left sciatic nerve of them was cut and were divided in two groups. In the first group the facial flap method for repair of nerve injury was used. In the second group VEIN CONDUIT method was used as standard method. Histological nerve repair was assessed after 45 days and the intact right sciatic nerve was used as control.Results: Repair of nerve injury in proximal, mid and distal portion of nerve in facial flap method was more effective than VEIN CONDUIT (P<0.05). Repair of nerve injury in proximal, mid and distal portion had no difference compared with control group (p>0.05) Conclusion: Repair of nerve injury with facial flap method is more effective than standard method and can be used as a new method for nerve repair.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    YAGHOUBI, A., SIRUS, A., AMINI, M., SHOJAEI, A., HAJ HASHEMI, S., OLYEN FEENI, F., & AHMADLOU, M.. (2014). COMPARISON OF FASCIAL FLAP AND VEIN CONDUIT FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY REPAIR IN RATS. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), 17(3 (85)), 76-81. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68902/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    YAGHOUBI A., SIRUS A., AMINI M., SHOJAEI A., HAJ HASHEMI S., OLYEN FEENI F., AHMADLOU M.. COMPARISON OF FASCIAL FLAP AND VEIN CONDUIT FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY REPAIR IN RATS. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ)[Internet]. 2014;17(3 (85)):76-81. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68902/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. YAGHOUBI, A. SIRUS, M. AMINI, A. SHOJAEI, S. HAJ HASHEMI, F. OLYEN FEENI, and M. AHMADLOU, “COMPARISON OF FASCIAL FLAP AND VEIN CONDUIT FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY REPAIR IN RATS,” ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), vol. 17, no. 3 (85), pp. 76–81, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68902/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button