DETERMINING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION DIAGNOSIS IN FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN DISTAL FOREARM PENETRATING WOUNDS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YAVARI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ) Year:2007 | Volume:10 | Issue:2 (39) Page(s): 67-72

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

2,100

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DETERMINING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION DIAGNOSIS IN FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN DISTAL FOREARM PENETRATING WOUNDS

Author(s)

YAVARI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FDSQ3

FDPQ3

PENETRATING TRAUMAQ3

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION VALUE OF DIAGNOSISQ3

Abstract

Introduction: In order to determine the importance and power of physical examination diagnosis, we decided to compare the results of physical examination in patients with distal forearm penetrating wound and whatever is observed during surgery as golden standard.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was performed on 91 patients with distal forearm sharp injury. Findings of physical examination were compared to what was found during surgery (definitive diagnosis) as golden standard.Results: Based on findings, PHYSICAL EXAMINATION VALUE OF DIAGNOSIS for FDP and FDS was determined. In FDS clinical examination value had 88% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 94% positive predictive value, 22% negative predictive value and 1.46 positive likelihood ratio, and 0.3 negative likelihood ratio; and FDP clinical examination value had 97% sensitivity, 25% specificity, 93% positive predictive value, 50% negative predictive value, 1.29 positive likelihood ratio and 0.12 negative likelihood ratio.Conclusion: Physical examination view point of rule in of flexor tendon injury because of sharp and PENETRATING TRAUMA is more valuable than rule out.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YAVARI, M.. (2007). DETERMINING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION DIAGNOSIS IN FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN DISTAL FOREARM PENETRATING WOUNDS. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), 10(2 (39)), 67-72. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/69010/en

Vancouver: Copy

YAVARI M.. DETERMINING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION DIAGNOSIS IN FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN DISTAL FOREARM PENETRATING WOUNDS. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ)[Internet]. 2007;10(2 (39)):67-72. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/69010/en

IEEE: Copy

M. YAVARI, “DETERMINING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION DIAGNOSIS IN FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN DISTAL FOREARM PENETRATING WOUNDS,” ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), vol. 10, no. 2 (39), pp. 67–72, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/69010/en

Related Journal Papers