مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

78
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

70
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

Patient Throughput Times for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Exams

Pages

  21-28

Abstract

 Background: To optimize screening abbreviated Breast MRI (ABMR) operations, patient throughput times of ABMR were compared to breast ultrasound (US) and full protocol Breast MRI (FPMR). Methods: patient throughput times (mean ± standard error) and its subcomponents were analyzed for 95 ABMRs, 90 breast US exams, and 50 FPMRs. Total patient throughput was measured from registration time to the time of the last acquired image. Actual exam time was time difference between the first and last acquired images and pre-examination time was the calculated difference between throughput and actual exam times. Results: ABMR total patient throughput time was shorter than FPMR (55. 7 ± 1. 7 vs. 63. 1 ± 2. 0 min; difference, 7. 4 min, 13%; p<0. 001), but longer than breast US (39. 1 ± 1. 3 min; difference, 16. 6 min, 30%; p<0. 001). ABMR had shorter actual scan times than FPMR (13. 4 ± 0. 14 vs. 18. 6 ± 0. 25 min; p<0. 001), but longer than US (9. 6 ± 0. 46 minutes; p<0. 001). There was no difference in the preexamination times between ABMR and FPMR (42. 3 ± 1. 7 vs. 44. 6 ± 1. 9 min; p = 0. 357); pre-examination times were longer for both MR exam types compared to US (29. 5 ± 1. 3 minutes; p<0. 001). Conclusion: ABMR patient throughput times are faster than FPMR, but these gains are limited as they have no impact on pre-examination activities which comprise the lengthiest components of the patient flow process. US patient flow currently remains faster than ABMR; however, comparable ABMR times could be achieved by further omitting certain sequences and optimizing pre-examination processes.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Plaza, Michael J., Cole, Denzel, Sanchez Gonzalez, Marcos A., & Starr, Christopher J.. (2021). Patient Throughput Times for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Exams. ARCHIVES OF BREAST CANCER, 8(1), 21-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/693499/en

Vancouver: Copy

Plaza Michael J., Cole Denzel, Sanchez Gonzalez Marcos A., Starr Christopher J.. Patient Throughput Times for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Exams. ARCHIVES OF BREAST CANCER[Internet]. 2021;8(1):21-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/693499/en

IEEE: Copy

Michael J. Plaza, Denzel Cole, Marcos A. Sanchez Gonzalez, and Christopher J. Starr, “Patient Throughput Times for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Exams,” ARCHIVES OF BREAST CANCER, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/693499/en

Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button