A REVIEW ON THE EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZAEIAN MOHSEN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RAFSANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES Year:2010 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 (35) Page(s): 125-134

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

886

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A REVIEW ON THE EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW

Author(s)

REZAEIAN MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JOURNALQ2

EDITORIAL PEER REVIEWQ3

EDITOR-IN-CHIEFQ3

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW. Materials and Methods: The Pubmed search engine (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and the Scientific Information Database search engine (http://www.sid.ir/fa/index.asp) were applied using "Editorial Peer Review". as the keywords. In the next step, by altering the search strategy and also using the reference lists of the retrieved papers, the most up-to-date references for this review study were retrieved.Discussion: Based on the retrieved articles, at first the definition and the different methods of the EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW are discussed. Then the usual biases within the EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW process are explained. At the end of the article, various responsibilities of the peers are referred to. Conclusion: Reviewing the scientific articles is an ethical responsibility of the scientists, and should be considered by them as an honor rather than as an extra burden. When accepting a review, scientists should carry out the task based on the highest feasible standards. They should not only help the EDITOR-IN-CHIEF to take the best possible decision about the article, but also assist the authors in raising the quality of their articles.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZAEIAN, MOHSEN. (2010). A REVIEW ON THE EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW. JOURNAL OF RAFSANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES, 9(2 (35)), 125-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/71011/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZAEIAN MOHSEN. A REVIEW ON THE EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW. JOURNAL OF RAFSANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES[Internet]. 2010;9(2 (35)):125-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/71011/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHSEN REZAEIAN, “A REVIEW ON THE EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW,” JOURNAL OF RAFSANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES, vol. 9, no. 2 (35), pp. 125–134, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/71011/en

Related Journal Papers