COMPARISON OF ACUTE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ACUTE OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI S.N.; MOUSAVINASAB S.N.A.D.; RAHMAN POUR ZANJANI H.; VAKILI M.M.; NAZARIAN M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS) Year:2007 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 (37) Page(s): 11-18

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

3,286

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ACUTE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ACUTE OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Author(s)

Keywords

OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMYQ3

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITISQ4

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMYQ3

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY (LC) is now used in the management of ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of LC for ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS (AC) and compare it with acute OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY (OC) and elective LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY (ELC) in terms of complications, conversion rate, and hospital stay and operation time.METHODS: This clinical study was carried out 01) 235 patients. Ninety-four patients with AC were admitted to emergency department. They were randomly divided into acute LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY (ALC) (n=46) and OC(n=48). One hundred and forty one patients with symptomatic gallstone underwent ELC.FINDINGS: The median of total stay was 5, 3 and 2 days (mean±SD 5.39±2.9, 3.39±3.14 and 1.99±1.3 days) in OC, ALC and ELC, respectively (p=0.005). The mean duration of operation time was 53.2±3.2, 58.8±29.3 and 39.9±18.8 minutes in OC, ALC and ELC, respectively (p=0.005). Major complications occurred in 5 patients (10.4%) with ac, 2 patients (5.1%) with ALC and 5 patients (3.6%) with ELC. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that in patients with ALC in comparison to OC, there are a decrease in total hospital stay, post operative hospital stay and major complications. LC should be considered as a first choice before open surgery.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, S.N., MOUSAVINASAB, S.N.A.D., RAHMAN POUR ZANJANI, H., VAKILI, M.M., & NAZARIAN, M.. (2007). COMPARISON OF ACUTE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ACUTE OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 9(2 (37)), 11-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73575/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI S.N., MOUSAVINASAB S.N.A.D., RAHMAN POUR ZANJANI H., VAKILI M.M., NAZARIAN M.. COMPARISON OF ACUTE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ACUTE OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2007;9(2 (37)):11-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73575/en

IEEE: Copy

S.N. HOSSEINI, S.N.A.D. MOUSAVINASAB, H. RAHMAN POUR ZANJANI, M.M. VAKILI, and M. NAZARIAN, “COMPARISON OF ACUTE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH ACUTE OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 9, no. 2 (37), pp. 11–18, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73575/en

Related Journal Papers