COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS V DIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOUSAVI NASAB SEYED MAJID; DANESHKAZEMI A.R.; AGHA BEYGI T.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

663

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS V DIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS

Author(s)

MOUSAVI NASAB SEYED MAJID | DANESHKAZEMI A.R. | AGHA BEYGI T. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CERAMIC INLAYSQ3

MICROJEAKAGEQ3

DIRECT COMPOSITEQ3

Abstract

Introduction: CERAMIC INLAYS are alternative systems for restoring dental cavities with tooth colored materials. These restorations may have some benefits over DIRECT COMPOSITE restorations such as reduction in the bulk of the cured composite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of DIRECT COMPOSITE restorations and CERAMIC INLAYS with two different resin cements.Materials & Methods: In this experimental study, 45 class V cavities (15 teeth in each group) were prepared in buccal surfaces of human extracted molars. For 30 cavities, CERAMIC INLAYS were prepared and were cemented either with Variolin k I Excite DSC or Panavia FlED primer. Fifteen samples were restored with Excite! Heliomolar (direct composite). Then the teeth were thermocycled and were covered with sticky wax and were immersed into the 2% Methylene blue for 48 hours. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally and dye penetration was determined. Data were statistically analyzed using nonparametric tests of Kruskal Wallis, and Mann Whitney with significance level 0.05.Results: Enamel margins showed less microleakage than dentin margins in all groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the materials used in this study (P>0.05).Conclusion: The materials used in this study can not completely prevent microlekage. It seems that CERAMIC INLAYS can not reduce microleakage over DIRECT COMPOSITE significantly.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOUSAVI NASAB, SEYED MAJID, DANESHKAZEMI, A.R., & AGHA BEYGI, T.. (2008). COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS V DIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 31(4 (63)), 329-334. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73935/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOUSAVI NASAB SEYED MAJID, DANESHKAZEMI A.R., AGHA BEYGI T.. COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS V DIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2008;31(4 (63)):329-334. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73935/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MAJID MOUSAVI NASAB, A.R. DANESHKAZEMI, and T. AGHA BEYGI, “COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS V DIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 31, no. 4 (63), pp. 329–334, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73935/en

Related Journal Papers