مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,231
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOY BEAN PROTEIN QUALITY BY USING NET PROTEIN RATIO (NPR), RELATIVE NET PROTEIN RATIO (RNPR), AND PROTEIN EFFICIENCY RATIO (PER) METHODS

Pages

  41-50

Abstract

 Introduction: Evaluation the quality of food proteins has a great importance in biological and economical view. However, biological, microbiological, chemical and combined methods have been used and introduced for determining quality of proteins. Among existed methods, NPR, RNPR and PER have been suggested as appropriate methods for determining quality of proteins. This study has been conducted to determine the quality of soya protein by using the mentioned methods on a soya product in 2003. Material and Methods: This study with experimental method has been made on 24 male wistar rats, aged 21 days, under 3 food diets in 8 groups: Soya (10% protein), Casein+Methionine (10% protein) and control (non protein). PERiod of study for NPR was 14 days. Protein intake and rat weight gain were determined for calculating NPR. PERiod of study for PER was 28 days. Protein intake and weight gain of animals were determined. Rate of NPR, RNPR and PER were evaluated by T test.Results: Indicators of NPR were calculated 3.65±0.35 and 4.37±0.48 for soya and Casein+Methionin respectively (P<0.01) and RNPR was 83. Indicator of PER were 2.28±0.35 and 3.04±0.24 for soya and Casein+Methionin respectively (P<0.001) and soya PER ratio to casein was 75%.Conclusion: Soya protein as compared with Casein has low but appropriate quality. The results showed that NPR, RNPR and PER for determine SOY BEAN quality is compatible with other studies.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHASEMI, Z., TAGHI ZADEH, M., SHAKER HOSSEINI, R., AMINPOUR, A., & VALAEI, NASER. (2004). BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOY BEAN PROTEIN QUALITY BY USING NET PROTEIN RATIO (NPR), RELATIVE NET PROTEIN RATIO (RNPR), AND PROTEIN EFFICIENCY RATIO (PER) METHODS. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 8(2 (Serial number 30)), 41-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/76410/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHASEMI Z., TAGHI ZADEH M., SHAKER HOSSEINI R., AMINPOUR A., VALAEI NASER. BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOY BEAN PROTEIN QUALITY BY USING NET PROTEIN RATIO (NPR), RELATIVE NET PROTEIN RATIO (RNPR), AND PROTEIN EFFICIENCY RATIO (PER) METHODS. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2004;8(2 (Serial number 30)):41-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/76410/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. GHASEMI, M. TAGHI ZADEH, R. SHAKER HOSSEINI, A. AMINPOUR, and NASER VALAEI, “BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOY BEAN PROTEIN QUALITY BY USING NET PROTEIN RATIO (NPR), RELATIVE NET PROTEIN RATIO (RNPR), AND PROTEIN EFFICIENCY RATIO (PER) METHODS,” SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 8, no. 2 (Serial number 30), pp. 41–50, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/76410/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top