مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

884
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FURROW IRRIGATION DESIGNING METHODS

Pages

  89-101

Abstract

 To design a FURROW IRRIGATION system, various methods have been presented. These methods are based on mathematical or emperical relationships. In this study, three methods of designing FURROW IRRIGATION including: the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) method, the Soil Conseravation Service (SCS) method, and the Walker and Skogerboe (W & S) method were evaluted in order to determine the most suitable method for recommendation to executive organizations. To compare these methods in Fars Area an irrigated farm with respect to land slope, topography, soil depth, and so on were selected. After plowing, land leveling, and preparing the furrows, gated pipes were installed at the upper end of each irrigation set. Then, field experiments were carried out to determine the maximum non-erosive inflow rate, constants of Kostiakov infiltration equation, Kostiakov-Lewis infiltration equation, intake family, and advance equation within selected sets of furrows. Afterwards, inflow time and the amount of run off were computed for each treatment. This procedure was repeated for two consecutive years. And the results were compared with each other. The differences in average design infiltration depths and the applied ones calculated by F.A.O., W & S, and S.C.S. varied from (-2 to 3.9), (-7.6 to8.6), and (-19.5 to -35.7), respectively. The results of the analyses indicated that F.A.O. and W & S methods showed closer agreements with field data. Hence, the results of this study can be used in design of FURROW IRRIGATION system at an acceptable level of confidence.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    SALEMI, H.R., & KESHMIRIPOUR, B.. (2006). COMPARISON OF FURROW IRRIGATION DESIGNING METHODS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 12(1), 89-101. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/7661/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SALEMI H.R., KESHMIRIPOUR B.. COMPARISON OF FURROW IRRIGATION DESIGNING METHODS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;12(1):89-101. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/7661/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H.R. SALEMI, and B. KESHMIRIPOUR, “COMPARISON OF FURROW IRRIGATION DESIGNING METHODS,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/7661/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button