مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

934
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE COMPARED WITH INDOMETHACIN SUPOSITORY IN UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIOPLASTY PATIENTS

Pages

  34-39

Abstract

 Many patients suffer from pain following surgical procedures. Narcotic drugs are frequently used to relieve post-operative pain but recent data according to several studies suggest the control of the post-op pain with NSAID drugs. In this study, we compared analgesic effect of indomethacin SUPPOSITORY to INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE. 37 patients of unilateral inguinal hernioplasty 17 to 60 years old were divided into two group: the first group (17 patients) received one indomethacin SUPPOSITORY every 8 hoursto relieve post-op pain and the second group (20 patients) received 0.5 mg/kg INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE every 8 hours; their pain was checked every 2 hours with visual analogue scale (VSA). Mean pain severity of PETHEDINE group was 57.3±14.9 compared with indomethacin group (46.1±20.2) in the first 6 hours post-op period. In the second, third and fourth6 hours mean pain severities in indomethacin group were 28.7± 16.1 vs. 22.6± 14.1 and 21.5±15.2 vs. 12.7±14.9 and 9.5±7.8 vs. 7.3±6.3 respectively. There was no meaningful difference between the two groups in pain relief in our study. Finally, it was concluded that indomethacin SUPPOSITORY was a good substitute for INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE to control post-op pain.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ARIA, B., ABDOLLAHI, A.A., RAHMANIPOUR ANARAKI, H., GOL ALIPOUR, M.J., & VAKILI, M.A.. (2002). POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE COMPARED WITH INDOMETHACIN SUPOSITORY IN UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIOPLASTY PATIENTS. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 9(1 (23)), 34-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82644/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ARIA B., ABDOLLAHI A.A., RAHMANIPOUR ANARAKI H., GOL ALIPOUR M.J., VAKILI M.A.. POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE COMPARED WITH INDOMETHACIN SUPOSITORY IN UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIOPLASTY PATIENTS. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2002;9(1 (23)):34-39. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82644/en

    IEEE: Copy

    B. ARIA, A.A. ABDOLLAHI, H. RAHMANIPOUR ANARAKI, M.J. GOL ALIPOUR, and M.A. VAKILI, “POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAMUSCULAR PETHEDINE COMPARED WITH INDOMETHACIN SUPOSITORY IN UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIOPLASTY PATIENTS,” JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 9, no. 1 (23), pp. 34–39, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82644/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top