مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,386
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

491
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

CREATIVITY, LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

Pages

  65-76

Abstract

 The present study is an attempt to investigate the relationship between CREATIVITY, language LEARNING STRATEGIES and language proficiency. To measure these three variables, Nelson Quick Check Test, Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL), and Creative Personality Measurement Questionnaire (CPM) were administered. These tests measure language proficiency, LEARNING STRATEGIES, and CREATIVITY respectively. The results showed that CREATIVITY and degree of strategy use and also CREATIVITY and language proficiency were significantly correlated; but the degree of strategy use and language proficiency did not show any relationship. As far as the participants' strategy use scores were concerned, no particular difference among high and low CREATIVITY subjects was discovered. But they were significantly different with respect to their language proficiency. The preferred strategy type for both high and low CREATIVITY groups was the metacognitive strategies and the least preferred strategy type for both groups turned out to be affective ones. The subjects were also divided into two groups of high and low proficiency. The favorite strategy type for the high proficiency group was the compensation strategies and the favorite strategy type for the low proficiency group was the metacognitive strategies. Both high and low proficiency groups preferred the affective strategies least of all.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    REZAEI, A.A., & ALMASIAN, M.. (2007). CREATIVITY, LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY. PAZHUHESH-E ZABANHA-YE KHAREJI, -(32 (Special Issue) English), 65-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/83189/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    REZAEI A.A., ALMASIAN M.. CREATIVITY, LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY. PAZHUHESH-E ZABANHA-YE KHAREJI[Internet]. 2007;-(32 (Special Issue) English):65-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/83189/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A.A. REZAEI, and M. ALMASIAN, “CREATIVITY, LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY,” PAZHUHESH-E ZABANHA-YE KHAREJI, vol. -, no. 32 (Special Issue) English, pp. 65–76, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/83189/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top