STUDY OF ZUMS FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWS ON

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KEYKHAEI A.; SARGAZI GH.H.; NAVIDIAN A.; TABASI M.A.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Year:2002 | Volume:4 | Issue:3 Page(s): 135-140

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,989

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STUDY OF ZUMS FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWS ON "FACULTY MEMBERS’ ASSESSMENT"

Author(s)

KEYKHAEI A. | SARGAZI GH.H. | NAVIDIAN A. | TABASI M.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FACULTY MEMBERSQ3

ASSESSMENTQ3

STUDENTQ3

Abstract

University FACULTY MEMBERS can be evaluated in different ways. One of the most controversial ways is an ASSESSMENT, which is done by STUDENTs.The present cross sectional study investigates the views held by 83 basic sciences FACULTY MEMBERS on FACULTY MEMBERS’ ASSESSMENT in 1380. The required data gathered through questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.Findings shows that 60.1% of the research population determined the ASSESSMENT by STUDENTs, more than 20% of the total score which is followed by research plans with 20.8%, self ASSESSMENT with 19.5%, group manager with 16.9%, ASSESSMENT by colleagues with 13%, taught unit courses with 8.9% and finally ASSESSMENT by Faculty education deputy with 5.2%.Research population believes that: personal grudges 57.9%, dishonesty 85.6% and carelessness 89.1% affects ASSESSMENT forms. Finally, On the basis of the findings, it can be said that if we wish to have a reliable evaluation of FACULTY MEMBERS, we should use different ASSESSMENT methods simultaneously.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KEYKHAEI, A., SARGAZI, GH.H., NAVIDIAN, A., & TABASI, M.A.. (2002). STUDY OF ZUMS FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWS ON "FACULTY MEMBERS’ ASSESSMENT". ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH), 4(3), 135-140. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/84525/en

Vancouver: Copy

KEYKHAEI A., SARGAZI GH.H., NAVIDIAN A., TABASI M.A.. STUDY OF ZUMS FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWS ON "FACULTY MEMBERS’ ASSESSMENT". ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH)[Internet]. 2002;4(3):135-140. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/84525/en

IEEE: Copy

A. KEYKHAEI, GH.H. SARGAZI, A. NAVIDIAN, and M.A. TABASI, “STUDY OF ZUMS FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWS ON "FACULTY MEMBERS’ ASSESSMENT",” ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 135–140, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/84525/en

Related Journal Papers