PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE: LCP VERSUS BUTTRESS T-PLATE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BIRJANDINEZHAD A.; EBRAHIMZADEH MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; SADRI MAHVELATI E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY Year:2008 | Volume:6 | Issue:3 (23) Page(s): 85-90

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,595

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE: LCP VERSUS BUTTRESS T-PLATE

Author(s)

BIRJANDINEZHAD A. | EBRAHIMZADEH MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | SADRI MAHVELATI E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TIBIAL FRACTURESQ3

FRACTURE FIXATIONQ3

INTERNALQ3

BONE PLATESQ3

Abstract

Background: Proximal tibial factures are complex injuries and are, historically associated with complication rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of locking compression plates (LCP) in comparison with T-buttress plates in treating proximal TIBIAL FRACTURES.Methods: In a prospective study, 62 patients (51 men, 11 women) with proximal tibial fracture referring to Mashhad Medical University Trauma Center were treated with T-buttress plate fixation in 35 and LCP in 27 cases. The treatment outcome was evaluated clinically and radiographically with 24 months (18-36 months) average follow-up.Results: In LCP group, there were 3 cases of Knee motion limitation, 1 malunion, 1 infection and no non-union; and in T-plate group, 4 cases of knee motion limitation, 6 malunions, 2 non-unions and 4 infections. There was, therefore, no significant difference in terms of joint range of motion between the two groups. Malunion and infection were, however, more common in T-plate fixation group.Conclusions: Locking compression plating in proximal TIBIAL FRACTURES provides stronger fixation and is associated with less malunion and infection as compared to T-plate fixation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BIRJANDINEZHAD, A., EBRAHIMZADEH, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, & SADRI MAHVELATI, E.. (2008). PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE: LCP VERSUS BUTTRESS T-PLATE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 6(3 (23)), 85-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/85311/en

Vancouver: Copy

BIRJANDINEZHAD A., EBRAHIMZADEH MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, SADRI MAHVELATI E.. PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE: LCP VERSUS BUTTRESS T-PLATE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY[Internet]. 2008;6(3 (23)):85-90. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/85311/en

IEEE: Copy

A. BIRJANDINEZHAD, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN EBRAHIMZADEH, and E. SADRI MAHVELATI, “PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE: LCP VERSUS BUTTRESS T-PLATE,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, vol. 6, no. 3 (23), pp. 85–90, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/85311/en

Related Journal Papers