QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAABANI VARKI B.; KAZEMI SEDIGHEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RAHBORD Year:2010 | Volume:19 | Issue:54 (SPECIAL ISSUE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH) Page(s): 33-58

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,017

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Author(s)

SHAABANI VARKI B. | KAZEMI SEDIGHEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

QUALITATIVE RESEARCHQ2

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCHQ3

MIXED RESEARCHQ2

PARA QUANTITATIVE METHODQ3

APPROXIMATE ARGUMENTQ3

Abstract

This article studies the two major research approaches in the field of research approaches. It emphasizes their epistemological foundations and their differences. Along these lines, the inadequacies of QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH leading to its failure in human science research are discussed. This article pays special attention to the four fold internal conflicts including version, holography, multivocality and skepticism in QUALITATIVE RESEARCHes based on phenomenology put forward by Harley, Hardy and Alison, and mentions the failure of QUALITATIVE RESEARCH in overcoming the obstacles created by methodology. Then, the emergence of MIXED RESEARCH as an insufficient substitute for the quantative and qualitative methods is criticized. Finally, given the fallacies made by Scott regarding quantitative, qualitative and MIXED RESEARCH, the authors introduce para-quantitative method as an alternative for overcoming the inadequacy of existing methods.

Cites

INTEGRATION METHOD: OUTCOMES OF THE REVIEW OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS

References

TRANSCENDENTAL REALISM AND FALSE DUALISM IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAABANI VARKI, B., & KAZEMI, SEDIGHEH. (2010). QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. RAHBORD, 19(54 (SPECIAL ISSUE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH)), 33-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89175/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAABANI VARKI B., KAZEMI SEDIGHEH. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. RAHBORD[Internet]. 2010;19(54 (SPECIAL ISSUE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH)):33-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89175/en

IEEE: Copy

B. SHAABANI VARKI, and SEDIGHEH KAZEMI, “QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS,” RAHBORD, vol. 19, no. 54 (SPECIAL ISSUE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH), pp. 33–58, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89175/en

Related Journal Papers