AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TWO SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE IN SADRIAN AND CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAKAI QASIM; RAHBAR HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KHERADNAME-YE SADRA Year:2013 | Volume:- | Issue:72 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

733

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TWO SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE IN SADRIAN AND CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHIES

Author(s)

KAKAI QASIM | RAHBAR HASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGEQ2

SADRAIN PHILOSOPHERSQ2

SENSE PERCEPTIONQ2

CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHERSQ2

INTELLECTQ2

Abstract

One of the important issues in contemporary epistemology is the discussion of the SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE. According to most epistemologists, these sources consist of SENSE PERCEPTION, INTELLECT, introspection, testimony, and memory. Following a comparative approach, this paper intends to explore and discuss two important SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE, that is, SENSE PERCEPTION and INTELLECT, based on the epistemological principles of Sadrian and CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHERS. Both groups consider sense-perception and the INTELLECT as the SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE. They view INTELLECTual perception higher than SENSE PERCEPTION and the INTELLECT as the main source of attaining the truth. At the same time, there exist some disagreements among them. For example, some of them believe that SENSE PERCEPTION is the source of all sciences, and some others deny the famous view of Scholastic philosophy as to “Whatever is in our INTELLECT must have previously been in the senses.”

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KAKAI, QASIM, & RAHBAR, HASSAN. (2013). AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TWO SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE IN SADRIAN AND CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHIES. KHERADNAME-YE SADRA, -(72), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89380/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAKAI QASIM, RAHBAR HASSAN. AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TWO SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE IN SADRIAN AND CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHIES. KHERADNAME-YE SADRA[Internet]. 2013;-(72):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89380/en

IEEE: Copy

QASIM KAKAI, and HASSAN RAHBAR, “AN ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TWO SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE IN SADRIAN AND CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHIES,” KHERADNAME-YE SADRA, vol. -, no. 72, pp. 0–0, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89380/en

Related Journal Papers