A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTD) AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTR) IN MINOR ELECTIVE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAND F.; SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM; AMINI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2006 | Volume:14 | Issue:2 Page(s): 24-29

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

734

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTD) AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTR) IN MINOR ELECTIVE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL

Author(s)

ZAND F. | SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM | AMINI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EQUIPMENTQ3

LARYNGEAL TUBEQ3

AIR WAYQ3

Abstract

Introduction: The reusable LARYNGEAL TUBE "LT-R" and disposable LARYNGEAL TUBE "LTD" are two relatively new devices for maintaining the airway during controlled ventilation under general ansthesia. The present inventilation was ained to compare the performance of the LT-R and LT-D in a randomized controlled study.Materials & Methods: One huandred ASA (I-II-III) patientsm aged 15-65 years, undergoing elective minor surgeries were randomized to receive either a LTR (N= 50) or LTD (N=50) for airway management. After induction of general anesthedia, devices were inserted, correct placement was verified, and airway leak pressure was measured. Time of insertion, quality of AIR WAY seal, fiberoptic view and postoperative pharyngeal morbidity was examined.Finding: The first and second time success rates were comparable for both groups (90 vs 96% and 96 vs 98% in LT-D and LTR groups, respectively). The air wary of two patients in the first group could not be maintained with LT-D. The time until delivery of first tidal volume for LT-D and LT-R was 28.48 ± 2.1 sec and 23±2.1, while fixation and manipulation time was 50±2.2 and 47±2.5 respectively. Afterward, the patients were questioned for any post-operative pharyngeal complications. No significant differences were seen between the two groups, regarding possible after- effects.Conclusion: It is concluded that both The devices seem to provide a secure airway similar clinical efficacy. Furthermore, it is easy to insert them all the same.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAND, F., SADEGHI, SEYED EBRAHIM, & AMINI, A.. (2006). A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTD) AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTR) IN MINOR ELECTIVE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL. JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 14(2), 24-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/90295/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAND F., SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM, AMINI A.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTD) AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTR) IN MINOR ELECTIVE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL. JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;14(2):24-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/90295/en

IEEE: Copy

F. ZAND, SEYED EBRAHIM SADEGHI, and A. AMINI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTD) AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE (LTR) IN MINOR ELECTIVE SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL,” JOURNAL OF ILAM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 24–29, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/90295/en

Related Journal Papers