PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KALANTARI KIUMARS; JAFARIAN SUTE SEIED HASAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Legal Research Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:56 Page(s): 307-332

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,009

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW

Author(s)

KALANTARI KIUMARS | JAFARIAN SUTE SEIED HASAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PLURALITY OF ACTUS REUS OF A CRIMEQ2

PROPORTIONAL COMBINED PUNISHMENT RULEQ2

ABSOLUTE COMBINED PUNISHMENT RULEQ2

Abstract

The plurality of the actus reus of a crime is one of the bases of attribution which has been prescribed in most legal systems so that, in Iran's legal system, Article 47 of the Islamic Penal Law and, in Egeypt, Articles 33 to 36 and 115 of the Penal Law are the basis for this.Although the Iranian and Egyptian legal systems are similar in their acceptance of the plurality of the actus reus system and in the separation of plurality of the actus reus of crime from the plurality of the mensrea of a crime, they are differences in the procedure for retribution in the presumption of combined.So, in this manner, Egyptian legislators unlike Iranian legislators accept the PROPORTIONAL COMBINED PUNISHMENT RULE in the plurality of the actus reus of a crime. Thus, the legislator combines the issue of sentencing with the process of enforcement in many cases.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KALANTARI, KIUMARS, & JAFARIAN SUTE, SEIED HASAN. (2012). PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, -(56), 307-332. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/91848/en

Vancouver: Copy

KALANTARI KIUMARS, JAFARIAN SUTE SEIED HASAN. PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE[Internet]. 2012;-(56):307-332. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/91848/en

IEEE: Copy

KIUMARS KALANTARI, and SEIED HASAN JAFARIAN SUTE, “PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW,” REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, vol. -, no. 56, pp. 307–332, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/91848/en

Related Journal Papers