DISCRETION OF CHIEF OF JUDICIARY AS A CAUSE FOR RETRIAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAHREINI FEREIDOON

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Legal Research Year:2011 | Volume:- | Issue:52 Page(s): 103-182

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,472

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DISCRETION OF CHIEF OF JUDICIARY AS A CAUSE FOR RETRIAL

Author(s)

NAHREINI FEREIDOON | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RETRIALQ2

CAUSATION OF RETRIALQ3

DISCRETION OF JUDICIARY CHIEFQ3

FINAL JUDGMENTQ3

VIVID INCONSISTENCY OF AWARD WITH SHARIAHQ3

LEGAL DEADLINEQ3

Abstract

The RETRIAL is one of the superlative ways for complaining about courts' judgment which is accepted and operated exceptionally and in specific aspects due to its restrictions and being exclusive. Rehearing is a superlative way and for that reason it can be carried out and taken effect only when a FINAL JUDGMENT was issued by a court and with resorting to exceptional and exclusive cases after admitting it to objectionable criminal and civil judgments. Meanwhile, third parties may not enter to this stage. Such particularities resulted in prominent situation for RETRIAL comparing with other methods such that no parties involving in the case, comparing with routine way of asking for appeal, could not easily try their fortune for reversing the Judgment resorting lawful approach and provide with other opportunity. Ignoring the provisions and limitations present for this legal approach, legislator, in 1980, developed appealing to this way by discretion of judiciary in an accelerated and abrupt action such that one can take to revision any FINAL JUDGMENT (whether Order or Judgment) issued by judiciary courts and so violate it. Although dispersing the RETRIAL and developing its realm to reverse the orders violated legally may fairly be proper for justice, but more and more applying it may reduce the importance of this violation procedure as well as its respect and may turn it to a routine method. The main objective of this paper is analyzing the regulation for revising Article 18 of revision in regulation for forming public and revolution courts enacted on 14 Jan 2007, where there has been established discretion of chief of judiciary in obvious discrepancy of award with shariah as one of the causations for RETRIAL In criminal and civil affairs. For this reason, we are deciding to discuss conditions and barriers for discretion of mentioned legal authority and elements of this newly established article as well as its effects.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NAHREINI, FEREIDOON. (2011). DISCRETION OF CHIEF OF JUDICIARY AS A CAUSE FOR RETRIAL. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, -(52), 103-182. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/91890/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAHREINI FEREIDOON. DISCRETION OF CHIEF OF JUDICIARY AS A CAUSE FOR RETRIAL. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE[Internet]. 2011;-(52):103-182. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/91890/en

IEEE: Copy

FEREIDOON NAHREINI, “DISCRETION OF CHIEF OF JUDICIARY AS A CAUSE FOR RETRIAL,” REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, vol. -, no. 52, pp. 103–182, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/91890/en

Related Journal Papers