THE ASSESSMENT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S CRITICISM OF KANT’S ANALYSIS OF CAUSALITY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TALEBZADEH SEYYED HAMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY) Year:2013 | Volume:41 | Issue:1 Page(s): 47-66

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,128

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ASSESSMENT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S CRITICISM OF KANT’S ANALYSIS OF CAUSALITY

Author(s)

TALEBZADEH SEYYED HAMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SCHOPENHAUERQ2

KANTQ2

CAUSALITYQ2

SUFFICIENT REASONQ2

PERCEPTIONQ2

Abstract

Arthur SCHOPENHAUER, in Four Aspects Root of the Principle of SUFFICIENT REASON, criticized KANT’s interpretation of CAUSALITY, which is written in the Second Analogy contained in the section of Principles of Pure Understanding. These criticisms express themselves along three main axes. By considering these criticisms, this article seeks to defend KANT’s account and to show that SCHOPENHAUER didn’t understand properly the arguments that KANT has given. In this article, on the one hand, KANT’s position, in contrast with SCHOPENHAUER’s view, is confirmed, but on the other hand, it is argued that KANT distorted the genuine meaning of CAUSALITY and meant CAUSALITY so that it was not consistent with the main aim that philosophers have taken at establishing CAUSALITY, hence the criticism of this article of KANT’s explanation of CAUSALITY.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TALEBZADEH, SEYYED HAMID. (2013). THE ASSESSMENT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S CRITICISM OF KANT’S ANALYSIS OF CAUSALITY. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), 41(1), 47-66. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/93721/en

Vancouver: Copy

TALEBZADEH SEYYED HAMID. THE ASSESSMENT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S CRITICISM OF KANT’S ANALYSIS OF CAUSALITY. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2013;41(1):47-66. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/93721/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED HAMID TALEBZADEH, “THE ASSESSMENT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S CRITICISM OF KANT’S ANALYSIS OF CAUSALITY,” FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/93721/en

Related Journal Papers