NIETZSCHE AND THE CRITIQUE OF KANTIAN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHBOOBI ARANI HAMIDREZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY) Year:2011 | Volume:39 | Issue:1 Page(s): 53-70

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,741

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NIETZSCHE AND THE CRITIQUE OF KANTIAN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY

Author(s)

MAHBOOBI ARANI HAMIDREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MORAL PSYCHOLOGYQ2

DELIBERATIONQ2

WILLQ2

DESIRES AND PASSIONSQ2

Abstract

MORAL PSYCHOLOGY is an important part of ethics. Some of the recent interpreters of Nietzsche’s philosophy have tried to elaborate a Nietzschean naturalistic MORAL PSYCHOLOGY based on his remarks and pose it against other positions in MORAL PSYCHOLOGY, especially the Kantian one with its fundamental claim that third-person accounts of MORAL PSYCHOLOGY have no bearing on a morality which purportedly guides us from the first-person perspective. Two of the main related constituents of Kant’s MORAL PSYCHOLOGY are the concepts of WILL and DELIBERATION, which in this paper I WILL try to show how, according to these recent interpreters, Nietzsche explains them entirely in terms of a system of desires, without any appeal to a separate WILL. If the Nietzschean account is correct, then the Kantian view that DELIBERATION proceeds from a standpoint detached from all desires could not be maintained.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHBOOBI ARANI, HAMIDREZA. (2011). NIETZSCHE AND THE CRITIQUE OF KANTIAN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), 39(1), 53-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/93741/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHBOOBI ARANI HAMIDREZA. NIETZSCHE AND THE CRITIQUE OF KANTIAN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2011;39(1):53-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/93741/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMIDREZA MAHBOOBI ARANI, “NIETZSCHE AND THE CRITIQUE OF KANTIAN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY,” FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/93741/en

Related Journal Papers