مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

155
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Deconstruction; result of Mullah Sadra's political-philosophical thought

Pages

  769-786

Abstract

 This study analyzes Mullah Sadra's critiques and innovations and among Islamic philosophers finds his thoughts and attitudes close to the concept of Derrida's "deconstruction "more than anyone else. Accordingly, article introduces Mulla sadra as a dissident and unhappy thoughtful philosopher with radical questioning style that although many do not consider him as a political thinker-Because he has not entered the political sphere-but according to harsh criticism towards Himself contemporary superficials Sufis and with Drawing Transcendental Wisdom, we can put him among Political theorists and philosophers. Mulla sadra propound Innovative topics in Mystical and philosophical sphere like existence, Substantial Motion and Bodily resurrection that seems representing such plans and reveling Adversity of Safavid government. His critique pushed him forward to find a deconstructionist language. In this regard, criticism, exposing contradictions and otherness that is the main factor of “ deconstructing” , will be examined in Mullah Sadras Platform. The findings indicate that there are comunalities between Sadra and Derrida. However, we face the fact that in some of issues these two chracters are different from one another. Derrida’ s ideology on phenomenology focuses only on human throwness to being in the present world; however, Mullah Sadras emphasizes on the significance of ecology and does not believe that death is the end of Heidegger’ s Dasein and Derrida’ s subject. Mullah Sadra’ s Hermeneutic meaning attempts to determine the author’ s intention based on the capacity, While from Derrida’ s deconstructionist view, author death is of utmost importance. Derrida’ s deconstructionist view contains continuously renewed pessimism toward things affirmed and approved. In contrary, Mullah Sadra believes in illustrative seeking perfection and aggravation in his total deconstructionism. That is, human ignorance is obviating the vitiations specific to his time in this condition.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AGHAHOSSEINI, ALIREZA, & BEHZADI, ZAHRA. (2020). Deconstruction; result of Mullah Sadra's political-philosophical thought. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 50(3 ), 769-786. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/950239/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AGHAHOSSEINI ALIREZA, BEHZADI ZAHRA. Deconstruction; result of Mullah Sadra's political-philosophical thought. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2020;50(3 ):769-786. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/950239/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA AGHAHOSSEINI, and ZAHRA BEHZADI, “Deconstruction; result of Mullah Sadra's political-philosophical thought,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 50, no. 3 , pp. 769–786, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/950239/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top