REFERRING TO CONSENSUS IN RATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOAZZEN SOLTANABADI MOHAMMAD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KALAM ISLAMI Year:2012 | Volume:21 | Issue:2 (82) Page(s): 89-119

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

670

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REFERRING TO CONSENSUS IN RATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES

Author(s)

MOAZZEN SOLTANABADI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONSENSUSQ2

THEOLOGICAL PROBLEMSQ2

RATIONAL PROBLEMSQ2

SHI’AQ2

MU’TAZELITESQ2

ASHA’ERITESQ2

MATURIDITESQ2

Abstract

There are different views among the Muslim scholars on the authority of CONSENSUS in doctrinal issues: All Asha’irites accept the validity of CONSENSUS in doctrinal matters, although some of them believe in some limitations in this matter. MU’TAZELITES, except for Nazzam, believe that CONSENSUS is a prove in the doctrinal issues and it can be referred to in such matters but Nazza does not give any value to CONSENSUS, not in the rules of law nor in doctrinal issues. MATURIDITES believe in the validity of CONSENSUS on the condition that it is supported by the Qur’an and the Islamic traditions; so according to them the CONSENSUS which is not supported by the two mentioned sources, not only in not valid but is a cause of the deviation of the community. There are some groups among Imamites- like Akhbarites- who do not believe in the validity of CONSENSUS, not in jurisprudential laws nor in theological issues. But the scholars of the principles of jurisprudence believe in the validity of the CONSENSUS that reveals the verdict of the infallible Imam. Two general views can be obtained from their words. First: the majority of the ancient and resent scholars believe in the validity of CONSENSUS both in jurisprudential laws and all doctrinal issues unless in the matters that the authority of CONSENSUS itself is based on them, like the existence of God or the prophethood. second: majority of the scholars of the recent countries – particularly fallowing the time of Sheikh al-Ansari, Have believed in the validity of CONSENSUS only in the jurisprudential laws and in other than these, they do not believe that it is a revealer of the verdict of the infallible because they believe that it is just the task of the Imam and his duty to express the jurisprudential laws and religious verdicts.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOAZZEN SOLTANABADI, MOHAMMAD. (2012). REFERRING TO CONSENSUS IN RATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES. KALAM ISLAMI, 21(2 (82)), 89-119. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/95263/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOAZZEN SOLTANABADI MOHAMMAD. REFERRING TO CONSENSUS IN RATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES. KALAM ISLAMI[Internet]. 2012;21(2 (82)):89-119. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/95263/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MOAZZEN SOLTANABADI, “REFERRING TO CONSENSUS IN RATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES,” KALAM ISLAMI, vol. 21, no. 2 (82), pp. 89–119, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/95263/en

Related Journal Papers