مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

380
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Studying the argument in challenging verses (Tahaddi) in argumentation theory

Pages

  1-21

Keywords

Tahaddy (challenge) 

Abstract

 The purpose of this study is to examine the Arguments used in Tahaddy verses based on Douglas Walton’ s (2008) framework. In this study, we contrast the Arguments presented by Tahaddy verses with Douglas Walton's (2008) Arguments, and then examine each Argument in turn. Muslims believe that God, as the creator of man and the absolute universe, provides the best Argument for convincing people, so it seems crucial to examine the Arguments in the Qur'an and make them known for their own benefit. Therefore, it is necessary to examine these Arguments, since the results of this research might lead to a deeper and more accurate understanding of human logic based on God's knowledge of man. It is known that God asks the polytheists in five verses if they claim this Qur'an is a human word (and the word of the Prophet himself), then bring even one verse like them. These verses are called Tahaddy in the Qur'an. This type of Argument seems to be a unique and exclusive type of Argument that does not fit into Walton's context due to its idiomatic meaning. Following our review of the Tahaddy verses and comparison with Walton's Argument schemas, the study came to the conclusion that the Argument used in the Tahaddy did not correspond to any of the sixty cases Walton introduced. Therefore, we introduced Tahaddy as a new Argument to this model with a new scheme.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Dogani, Shadi, ESTAJI, AZAM, & SEYEDI, HOSEIN. (2021). Studying the argument in challenging verses (Tahaddi) in argumentation theory. JOURNAL OF ARABIC LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE, 13(2 (25) ), 1-21. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/953969/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Dogani Shadi, ESTAJI AZAM, SEYEDI HOSEIN. Studying the argument in challenging verses (Tahaddi) in argumentation theory. JOURNAL OF ARABIC LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE[Internet]. 2021;13(2 (25) ):1-21. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/953969/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Shadi Dogani, AZAM ESTAJI, and HOSEIN SEYEDI, “Studying the argument in challenging verses (Tahaddi) in argumentation theory,” JOURNAL OF ARABIC LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE, vol. 13, no. 2 (25) , pp. 1–21, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/953969/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button