مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

410
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Discourse analysis of scientific supremacy in Iran

Pages

  183-195

Abstract

 Background and objective: The term “ Scientific supremacy” was first introduced by Ayatollah Khamenei and had been explained many times in meetings with academic faculties. After that, achieving this great goal was included in the vision document of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the comprehensive scientific map of the country; and various researchers defined, interpreted and explained this concept; so the definition and examples of this concept developed over time and in addition to the direct meaning of this concept the parallel concepts were formed and developed, therefore, due to the need to explain the roots of this concept over time, this study aim was analyze the discourse of Scientific supremacy in Iran. Methods and Materials: This qualitative study was conducted according to Norman Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis method, this method focused on three categories of text, discourse action and social action. For this purpose, the contemporary discourse of Iran in the field of Scientific supremacy was examined and analyzed according to the Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis method. Results: The findings of this study consisted of 1232 codes (simple and compound) which led to the abstraction of 40 discourse themes. Conclusion: Identifying the discourse context of Scientific supremacy in the country will help to define more accurately, scientific measurement and more appropriate planning to achieve supremacy.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    YAZDANI, SHAHRAM, Siahtir, Maryam, & HOSEINI ABARDEH, MARYAM. (2020). Discourse analysis of scientific supremacy in Iran. TEB VA TAZKIEH, 29(3 ), 183-195. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/964372/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    YAZDANI SHAHRAM, Siahtir Maryam, HOSEINI ABARDEH MARYAM. Discourse analysis of scientific supremacy in Iran. TEB VA TAZKIEH[Internet]. 2020;29(3 ):183-195. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/964372/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHAHRAM YAZDANI, Maryam Siahtir, and MARYAM HOSEINI ABARDEH, “Discourse analysis of scientific supremacy in Iran,” TEB VA TAZKIEH, vol. 29, no. 3 , pp. 183–195, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/964372/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button