ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF TERM BIRTH WEIGHT IN IRANIAN WOMEN: COMPARISON OF THREE FORMULAE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHEKARCHI B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research Year:2011 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 (SERIAL NUMBER 34) Page(s): 78-80

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,156

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF TERM BIRTH WEIGHT IN IRANIAN WOMEN: COMPARISON OF THREE FORMULAE

Author(s)

SHEKARCHI B. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FETAL WEIGHTQ2

PREDICTIONQ3

ULTRASONOGRAPHYQ3

Abstract

Introduction: The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of three ultrasonic fetal biometric formulae (Campbell, Shepard, and Hadlock) for estimating term FETAL WEIGHT.Methods: ULTRASONOGRAPHY was performed in 92 uncomplicated pregnancies. Fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, and femur length were measured. Simple linear regression was used for evaluating the correlation between derived weights and each formula.Results: The mean (SD) actual weight was 3251.5 (403.3) grams. The mean (SD) measured weights according to Campbell et al, Shepard et al, and Hadlock et al formulae were 3309.7 (411.1), 3246.7 (433.2), and 3323.1 (383.2) grams, respectively. R2 (R squares) of the Hadlock formula was the highest (0.77), followed by 0.75 for the Campbell formula and (0.68) for the Shepard. Conclusion: There was discrepancy between obtained results in comparison to other former reports from other countries and ethnicity is one of its reasons. We recommend that the Hadlock or Campbell formulas are the formulas of choice in the calculation of FETAL WEIGHT in Iranian population.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHEKARCHI, B.. (2011). ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF TERM BIRTH WEIGHT IN IRANIAN WOMEN: COMPARISON OF THREE FORMULAE. ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 9(2 (SERIAL NUMBER 34)), 78-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/96778/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHEKARCHI B.. ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF TERM BIRTH WEIGHT IN IRANIAN WOMEN: COMPARISON OF THREE FORMULAE. ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH[Internet]. 2011;9(2 (SERIAL NUMBER 34)):78-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/96778/en

IEEE: Copy

B. SHEKARCHI, “ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF TERM BIRTH WEIGHT IN IRANIAN WOMEN: COMPARISON OF THREE FORMULAE,” ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, vol. 9, no. 2 (SERIAL NUMBER 34), pp. 78–80, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/96778/en

Related Journal Papers