مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,147
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARE OF TWO METHODS OF DIRECT PCR AND PCR WITH DNA EXTRACTION IN CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS TYPING

Pages

  5-12

Abstract

 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a suitable method for detecting pathogenic agents and first step in this process is DNA EXTRACTION. DNA EXTRACTION enumerate as a long stage in molecular genetic researches that is longer than total PCR process in some cases. The aim of this research is use of DIRECT PCR (without DNA EXTRACTION) for different typing of CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS. In this study DIRECT PCR and also PCR by extracted DNA was implemented on the A, B, C and D types of CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS. For this purpose four pairs of specific primers that were complementary with parts of the genes encoding a, b, e and i toxins of this bacterium were used. In both DIRECT PCR and PCR by extracted DNA, 196, 324 and 655 bp fragments were amplified that are dependent to a, b and e toxins respectively. Upshot different strains of this bacterium were identified based on amplified fragment length in PCR. The result showed that success of PCR is simple from colony directly and quality of created bands is the same in both methods. Therefore, use of this method is recommended because the DIRECT PCR reduce time, steps and cost of PCR and provide possibility of testing many samples in shorter times provides.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHSANI, M.R., & SHAMSADDINI, B.M.. (2013). COMPARE OF TWO METHODS OF DIRECT PCR AND PCR WITH DNA EXTRACTION IN CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS TYPING. SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH IRANIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 8(4 (37)), 5-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/97238/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHSANI M.R., SHAMSADDINI B.M.. COMPARE OF TWO METHODS OF DIRECT PCR AND PCR WITH DNA EXTRACTION IN CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS TYPING. SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH IRANIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;8(4 (37)):5-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/97238/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M.R. AHSANI, and B.M. SHAMSADDINI, “COMPARE OF TWO METHODS OF DIRECT PCR AND PCR WITH DNA EXTRACTION IN CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS TYPING,” SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH IRANIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, vol. 8, no. 4 (37), pp. 5–12, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/97238/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops

  • No record.





  • Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button