مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,912
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

16

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING (CASE STUDY: KASILIAN WATERS HED)

Pages

  81-90

Abstract

 Determination of hydrologic parameters is important in view point of safety, project economy and efficiency of hydraulic structures. The runoff is one of the important parameters whose measurement has different limitations and therefore the application of hydrologic models in estimation of flood hydrograph is necessary. In this research an attempt has been made to compare the applicability of different statistical analysis methods to select the best one in developing rainfall-runoff model. To achieve the study goals, 15, 11 and 12 characteristics of hyetograph, hydrograph and their time spacing were considered, respectively, for 49 storms in KASILIAN watershed. The study area located in the north of IRAN and comprises 66.75 Km2. The relationships were investigated using bivariate in different forms viz. Linear, logarithmic, power, exponential, cubic, quadratic, compound, inverse, grow curve and S models as well as multivariate in different forms viz. stepwise, forward and backward after conducting FACTOR ANALYSIS approach. The results of rainfall-runoff modeling process showed that the bivariate regression were mostly developed in the form of cubic, linear, compound and power models. Furthermore, consideration of results of multivariate regression verified the low accuracy of FACTOR ANALYSIS method. Among other three methods, the stepwise and backward methods have had better performance, alternatively. The results of forward method were also similar to stepwise method.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SADEGHI, S.H.R., MORADI, H.R., MOZAYAN, MALIHEH, & VAFAKHAH, M.. (2005). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING (CASE STUDY: KASILIAN WATERS HED). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 12(3), 81-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/9769/en

Vancouver: Copy

SADEGHI S.H.R., MORADI H.R., MOZAYAN MALIHEH, VAFAKHAH M.. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING (CASE STUDY: KASILIAN WATERS HED). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES[Internet]. 2005;12(3):81-90. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/9769/en

IEEE: Copy

S.H.R. SADEGHI, H.R. MORADI, MALIHEH MOZAYAN, and M. VAFAKHAH, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING (CASE STUDY: KASILIAN WATERS HED),” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 81–90, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/9769/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top