A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARGUMENT FROM COMMON CONSENSUS AND THAT FROM HUMAN INNATE NATURE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MUHAMMADREZAEE M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2009 | Volume:10 | Issue:4 (40) Page(s): 109-125

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,028

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARGUMENT FROM COMMON CONSENSUS AND THAT FROM HUMAN INNATE NATURE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Author(s)

MUHAMMADREZAEE M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMMON CONSENSUS ARGUMENTQ2

INNATE NATURE ARGUMENTQ2

BASIC BELIEFQ3

INBORN NATUREQ2

THE IDEA OF GODQ2

THE BELIEF IN GODQ1

Abstract

This research intends to compare the COMMON CONSENSUS ARGUMENT with the INNATE NATURE ARGUMENT for the existence of God. First, different versions of COMMON CONSENSUS ARGUMENT have been proposed: 1. Biological interpretations which through the generality of THE BELIEF IN GOD go not only to prove that such a belief as an inborn idea, but also the existence of God. 2. The dilemma against skepticism which in addition to the popular belief (in God) have made use of reason in order to prove the existence of God. John Locke’s criticisms and others’ have also been discussed critically and the possible answers given to them by the defenders of the argument are set forth. Then different versions of INNATE NATURE ARGUMENT established by some Muslim thinkers and the suggested account of it by the author are introduced in brief. Later, Alvin Plantinga's theory which considers THE BELIEF IN GOD as a BASIC BELIEF and is very similar to INNATE NATURE ARGUMENT is proposed.Finally, having made a comparison between the COMMON CONSENSUS ARGUMENT and innate nature one, it has gone proven that the latter argument is stronger than the former, because John Locke’s criticisms raised against the former fail to undermine the latter.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MUHAMMADREZAEE, M.. (2009). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARGUMENT FROM COMMON CONSENSUS AND THAT FROM HUMAN INNATE NATURE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 10(4 (40)), 109-125. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98209/en

Vancouver: Copy

MUHAMMADREZAEE M.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARGUMENT FROM COMMON CONSENSUS AND THAT FROM HUMAN INNATE NATURE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2009;10(4 (40)):109-125. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98209/en

IEEE: Copy

M. MUHAMMADREZAEE, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ARGUMENT FROM COMMON CONSENSUS AND THAT FROM HUMAN INNATE NATURE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 10, no. 4 (40), pp. 109–125, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98209/en

Related Journal Papers