Metadata and Archival Standards in Archival Software: A Comparative Study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sharifinia Ali asghar; SHARIF MOGHADDAM HADI; ZIAEI SORAYA; SALAMI MARYAM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: GANJINE-YE ASNAD Year:2019 | Volume:29 | Issue:3 (115) Page(s): 170-201

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

520

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Metadata and Archival Standards in Archival Software: A Comparative Study

Author(s)

Sharifinia Ali asghar | SHARIF MOGHADDAM HADI | ZIAEI SORAYA | SALAMI MARYAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Metadata standardQ1

Archival standardQ1

Comparative studyQ1

Archival softwareQ1

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examines and compares compliance of seven software, namely Calm for Archives Version 9. 3, Collective Access Version 1. 7, Archives Space Version 2. 4. 1, Archivematica Version 1. 8, Adlib XPlus Version 2, Cuadra Star Single version and Eloquent Archives Single version with the existing Archival standards. Methodology and Research Design: A researcher deigned checklist consisting of 9 main and 62 sub-sections was used to record 272 features of the Archival software, then compared against existing standards and with each other. Findings and Conclusion: Significancant differences were noticed. Calm for Archives, Collective Access, Archives Space, Archivematica, Adlib XPlus, Cuadra Star, Eloquent Archives are (p-value) <0. 05. In addition, the chi-square was larger than the critical table χ 2 with df = 1. Most features and capabilities respectively are Archival softwares: Archives Space 54%, Adlib XPlus 39%, Eloquent Archives 37%, Calm for Archives 29%, Collective Access 28%, Archivematica 27%, and Cuadra Star 26%. With respect to the support of Metadata standards, Archives Space, Cuadra Star, Eloquent Archives, Archivematica, Collective Access, Calm for Archives, and Adlib XPlus will be archiving, and in support of Archival standards, respectively, Archives Space, Eloquent Archives, Adlib XPlus, Cuadra Star, Calm for Archives, Collective Access and Archivematica. Regarding the support of the exchange protocols, Archives Space earned the first position and Adlib XPlus, ranked second, while the rest of the softwares were similar.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Sharifinia, Ali asghar, SHARIF MOGHADDAM, HADI, ZIAEI, SORAYA, & SALAMI, MARYAM. (2019). Metadata and Archival Standards in Archival Software: A Comparative Study. GANJINE-YE ASNAD, 29(3 (115) ), 170-201. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/99105/en

Vancouver: Copy

Sharifinia Ali asghar, SHARIF MOGHADDAM HADI, ZIAEI SORAYA, SALAMI MARYAM. Metadata and Archival Standards in Archival Software: A Comparative Study. GANJINE-YE ASNAD[Internet]. 2019;29(3 (115) ):170-201. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/99105/en

IEEE: Copy

Ali asghar Sharifinia, HADI SHARIF MOGHADDAM, SORAYA ZIAEI, and MARYAM SALAMI, “Metadata and Archival Standards in Archival Software: A Comparative Study,” GANJINE-YE ASNAD, vol. 29, no. 3 (115) , pp. 170–201, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/99105/en

Related Journal Papers