مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,534
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE IMPLICATION OF CONDITION (SHARTD) RULE IN BANKING CONTRAC

Pages

  149-178

Keywords

ARTICLE (SHARTD) RULEQ1
VALID ARTICLE (AL-SHARTD-AL- SAHIHQ1
VOID CONDITION (AL-SHARTD-AL-BATDIL)Q1

Abstract

 Article (shartd) rule is the most used jurisprudential (fiqhi) rule in banking contracts. This rule means that some articles (al-shoroutd) can be included in contract that are binding where they have the validity (sihhat) conditions. Based on this contract, not every article (shartd) can be included in contract; it will be binding where it has some qualifications. The main question of the paper is whether banks have correctly benefitted from the capacity of article (shartd) rule in making banking contracts. The paper through a descriptive methodology and content analysis method and using imamiyya jurisprudence (fiqh), tests this hypothesis that conditions included in contract (shoroutd dimn-al-aqd) in some of banking contracts have some insufficiencies from the point of accommodation with measures of condition (shartd) rule. If this hypothesis proves to be true, banks should review banking contracts in order to correct them. The results show that conditions like consideration (vajh-al-iltizam), irrevocable power of attorney (wikala bila azl) and compensating the loss in mudaraba have canonical deficiencies. Moreover, conditions like determining insurance costs, probable losses, taking hands off from lesion option in an imposed manner and one-way condition are in in behalf of bank such that make the whole contract unjust and the applicant of loan is put under coercion (idtirar) conditions.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAZARPOUR, MOHAMMDTAGHI, & MOLLAKARIMI, FERESHTEH. (2017). THE IMPLICATION OF CONDITION (SHARTD) RULE IN BANKING CONTRAC. EGHTESAD-E ISLAMI, 17(65), 149-178. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/99748/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAZARPOUR MOHAMMDTAGHI, MOLLAKARIMI FERESHTEH. THE IMPLICATION OF CONDITION (SHARTD) RULE IN BANKING CONTRAC. EGHTESAD-E ISLAMI[Internet]. 2017;17(65):149-178. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/99748/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMDTAGHI NAZARPOUR, and FERESHTEH MOLLAKARIMI, “THE IMPLICATION OF CONDITION (SHARTD) RULE IN BANKING CONTRAC,” EGHTESAD-E ISLAMI, vol. 17, no. 65, pp. 149–178, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/99748/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button