Background: In this study, the artificial intelligence (AI) techniques used for the detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from the chest x-ray were reviewed. Methods: PubMed, arXiv, and Google Scholar were used to search for AI studies. Results: A total of 20 papers were extracted from Google Scholar, 14 from arXiv, and 5 from PubMed. In 17 papers, publicly available datasets and in 3 papers, independent datasets were used. 10 papers disclosed source codes. Nine papers were about creating a novel AI software, 8 papers reported the modification of the existing AI models, and 3 compared the performance of the existing AI software programs. All papers have used deep learning as AI technique. Most papers reported accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the models, and also the area under the curve (AUC) for investigation of the model performance for the prediction of COVID-19. Nine papers reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The number of datasets used in the studies ranged from 50 to 94323. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the models ranged from 0. 88 to 0. 98, 0. 80 to 1. 00, and 0. 70 to 1. 00, respectively. Conclusion: The studies revealed that AI can help human in fighting the new Coronavirus.

Background: Automated image segmentation is an essential step in quantitative image analysis. This study assesses the performance of a deep learning-based model for lung segmentation from computed tomography (CT) images of normal and COVID-19 patients. Methods: A descriptive-analytical study was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021 on the CT images of patients from various educational hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran). Of the selected images and corresponding lung masks of 1, 200 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 1, 080 were used to train a residual neural network. The performance of the residual network (ResNet) model was evaluated on two distinct external test datasets, namely the remaining 120 COVID-19 and 120 normal patients. Different evaluation metrics such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean absolute error (MAE), relative mean Hounsfield unit (HU) difference, and relative volume difference were calculated to assess the accuracy of the predicted lung masks. The MannWhitney U test was used to assess the difference between the corresponding values in the normal and COVID-19 patients. P<0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The ResNet model achieved a DSC of 0. 980 and 0. 971 and a relative mean HU difference of-2. 679% and-4. 403% for the normal and COVID-19 patients, respectively. Comparable performance in lung segmentation of normal and COVID-19 patients indicated the model’, s accuracy for identifying lung tissue in the presence of COVID-19-associated infections. Although a slightly better performance was observed in normal patients. Conclusion: The ResNet model provides an accurate and reliable automated lung segmentation of COVID-19 infected lung tissue. A preprint version of this article was published on arXiv before formal peer review (https: //arXiv. org/abs/2104. 02042).

Let D be a digraph with skew-adjacency matrix S (D). The skew energy of D is defined as the sum of the norms of all eigenvalues of S (D). Two digraphs are said to be skew equienergetic if their skew energies are equal. We establish an expression for the characteristic polynomial of the skew adjacency matrix of the join of two digraphs, and for the respective skew energy, and thereby construct non-cospectral, skew equienergetic digraphs on n vertices, for all n ³ 6. Thus we arrive at the solution of some open problems proposed in [X. Li, H. Lian, A survey on the skew energy of oriented graphs, arXiv: 1304.5707].

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT) in comparison with the routine dose (RD) CT images in detecting lung lesions related to COVID-19. Methods: A prospective study was conducted during AprilSeptember 2020 at Shahid Faghihi Hospital affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. In total, 273 volunteers with suspected COVID-19 participated in the study and successively underwent RD-CT and ULD-CT chest scans. Two expert radiologists qualitatively evaluated the images. Dose assessment was performed by determining volume CT dose index, dose length product, and size-specific dose estimate. Data analysis was performed using a ranking test and kappa coefficient (κ, ). P<0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Lung lesions could be detected with both RD-CT and ULD-CT images in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID19 (κ, =1. 0, P=0. 016). The estimated effective dose for the RD-CT protocol was 22-fold higher than in the ULD-CT protocol. In the case of the ULD-CT protocol, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value for the detection of consolidation were 60%, 83%, 80%, and 20%, respectively. Comparably, in the case of RD-CT, these percentages for the detection of groundglass opacity (GGO) were 62%, 66%, 66%, and 18%, respectively. Assuming the result of real-time polymerase chain reaction as true-positive, analysis of the receiver-operating characteristic curve for GGO detected using the ULD-CT protocol showed a maximum area under the curve of 0. 78. Conclusion: ULD-CT, with 94% dose reduction, can be an alternative to RD-CT to detect lung lesions for COVID-19 diagnosis and follow-up. An earlier preliminary report of a similar work with a lower sample size was submitted to the arXive as a preprint. The preprint is cited as: https: //arXiv. org/abs/2005. 03347