The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), which emerged in late 2019, has spread throughout the world as a widely known pandemic, claiming over 3 million lives as of April 2021. 1 The chaos resulting from the spread of this infectious disease caused great uncertainty and an urgent need to find an effective treatment. However, the issue in handling COVID-19 patients is limiting the number of patient care services available. During the COVID-19 pandemic, palliative care has received significant public attention. 2 The COVID-19 patients with certain conditions who do not meet Intensive Care Unit criteria can alternatively expect palliative care. Palliative care is handled by the Hospital Palliative Care Team, which offers Decision-Making support and psychosocial care for patients and their families...

Objective: The human Decision-Making process is complex and influenced by various factors. Investors' emotional decisions cause stock prices to deviate from real ones, leading to incorrect stock pricing and consequently inefficient investment. In response to criticisms of traditional financial theories, behavioral finance seeks to explain the anomalies in financial markets by considering the fact that investors are not entirely rational and their behavioral biases influence their decisions. Due to the necessity of the subject and the lack of a comprehensive model that shows the factors influencing the Decision-Making of investors in the Iranian capital market, the present study developed this model. Methods: The multi-grounded theory method was used in the current study. In-depth semi-structured interviews with professional experts were arranged to collect data. The statistical population of the present study included individual investors active in the Iranian capital market. The process of conducting interviews, analyzing them, and presenting the model started in March 2019 and continued by the end of 2021. Finally, 67 main categories and 218 concepts were extracted from conducted interviews that formed the overall model of the research. Results: Causal factors which influence investors’ decision making include: regret aversion, greed, fear, cognitive dissonance, reputation, anchoring, self-attribution biases, loss aversion, gambling pleasure, investment thinking, herding behavior, endowment bias, representativeness biases, false excitement, overconfidence biases, hindsight bias, regency bias, mental accounting, illusion of control bias, trading asymmetry, similarity error, magnet effect, gambler's fallacy, motivation, time horizon, first profit effect, experience, age, gender, are analyzed. Conclusion: Based on the research results, individual investors can improve the quality of their Decision-Making and make more effective investment decisions by implementing the presented strategies, and also by identifying and reducing their mental biases. These strategies include self-analysis, note-taking, capital market knowledge, concentration, holistic, patience, acceptance, mistakes review, self-reliance, consulting, openness to criticism, flexibility, study, diversification, and distract.

It is highly important to identify the factors influencing the observations of ethical values by players and coaches in small and great events. Therefore, the present research is to examin the relation between emotional intelligence and ethical Decision-Making among soccer coaches in Tehran. This research is descriptive-co relational, and is conducted in the field. The subjects of this study were all the coaches of the Premier League in Tehran soccer (Tehran Vision) in 1394 which includes 62 people. The tools employed included standard questionnaires of Decision-Making in Caswell’ s (2003) difficult situations, and Lan et al’ s (2009) emotional intelligence questionnaire. The data were analyzed through Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression tests. The results showed that there is a positive, significant correlation between all the subscales of emotional intelligence and the ethical Decision-Making of the coaches. Finally, the results of the regression showed that emotional intelligence and self-regulation subscales and optimism can anticipate the ethical Decision-Making of the coaches.