In addition to structure, Kristeva emphasizes the two components of subject and language to obtain meaning. Based on these two important components of Kristeva’, s thought, which form the basis of the formation of Intertextuality, the discussion is examined in two axes. Considering that the meaning is the result of cooperation and connection between language and subject, what is the purpose of understanding the meaning of religious propositions and basically the language of religion in both written and spoken forms? Does Intertextuality provide a way to understand the meaning of the language of religion? As a result, we realize that the use of Intertextuality in the field of religious language cannot achieve a single meaning due to the dynamics of the language and the subject of Kristeva’, s thought.