Purpose: The research aims to identify the effective factors on the health, safety and Environment (HSE) risk Literacy promotion model.Method: the researcher has analyzed the results and findings of previous researchers by applying a systematic and meta synthesis approach and by performing the 7 steps of the Sandelovski and Barroso method, he has identified the effective factors. Among 556 articles, 55 articles were selected based on the CASP method, and the validity of the analysis was confirmed with the Kappa coefficient value of 0.711. In this context, to measure reliability and quality control, the transcription method was used, and its value was identified for the indicators identified at the level of excellent agreement. The results of data analysis collected in MAXQDA software led to the identification of 84 primary codes in 16 categories in 5 dimensions.Findings: Finally, five dimensions of planning, concepts of Literacy development, implementation of education, evaluation and revision were identified as influencing dimensions of health, safety and Environmental risk Literacy.Conclusion: Organizations can focus on these factors in order to improve the Literacy of HSE risks as one of the preventive and improving decision-making factors among their employees. Improving the Literacy of HSE risks requires the attention and assistance of extra-organizational, organizational and individual factors.

Background and Objectives: Environmental health Literacy (EHL) pertains to the ability to comprehend and utilize Environmental data in order to make informed choices regarding one's health. The aim of this study is to evaluate EHL, encompassing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors (KAP) regarding general Environmental health (GEH) and Specific Environmental Media (air, food, and water), as well as their socio-demographic determinants. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted to examine the EHL of 678 women who visited comprehensive health centers in Zanjan city in 2023. Data was collected through multi-stage random sampling using the validated EHL Scale, and analyzed with SPSS 23 software at a significance level below 0. 05. Results: The study found that while most women have good knowledge of GEH (80. 7%), water (60. 3%), and food (90. 9%), only 26. 7% are knowledgeable about air HL. Additionally, 33. 9% had a positive attitude towards GEH, while only 13. 7% felt positively about air quality. Many participants showed limited knowledge (37. 5%) and a negative attitude (43. 8%) towards air quality. Significant correlations exist between age, marital status, economic status, training participation, and women's EHL. Conclusion: The level of women's GEH and specific Environmental media (air, food, and water) was high. However, their level of Literacy in air media was lower than the other areas. To enhance Environmental health Literacy, health authorities should capitalize on women's potential and introduce specific programs to boost their air Literacy.

Background and Aim: One of the most important issues of human life is Environmental protection. On the other hand, One of the most influential and an important factor in maintaining the Environmental is Environmental Literacy. Among the variables affecting people’, s Environmental Literacy is their knowledge and attitude towards the Environment. Therefore, awareness of individuals’,knowledge and attitude is essential for better implementation of plans and programs to improve the Environmental circumstances. The purpose of this study is to investigate the level of Environmental Literacy in the city of Mohajeran. Methods: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study. The required data were collected from the completion of 362 questionnaires has been collected by interviews in 2020 in the city of Mohajeran. A researcher made questionnaire was prepared consisted of three sections of individual information, knowledge and attitude questions. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Ethical Considerations: Ethical aspects including preserving the authenticity of texts, honesty, trustworthiness, confidentiality of information and obtaining informed consent have been observed. Results: The mean and standard deviation of knowledge is 1. 17, 0. 907 (responses in range-10 to 10) at a higher level of average and the mean and standard deviation of attitude is 0. 485, 1. 25 (responses in range-6 to 10) at a relatively positive. There was a positive and significant correlation between awareness and attitude toward the Environment. There was a significant difference between knowledge scores based on education and history of underlying disease. Awareness of people with higher education is more than people with low education. Awareness of people with a history of illness is more than people who have no history of illness. There was a significant difference between the scores of attitude based on education and age and history of disease. The attitude of people with high education is more positive than people with low education. People with underlying disease have a positive attitude to the Environmental and people with high age have a positive attitude toward people with low ages. Conclusion: Based on the results of the research, although the scores of knowledge and attitude of citizens of Mohajeran were high and positive than the Environment, but, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive program in order to provide human development, in order to promote Literacy and Environmental culture. It is hoped the results to help the relevant authorities and policymakers in planning.