The article shows that the life style is the source of collective memory, the cul-ture of thinking influences its content and dynamics, culture, but the language is the carrier of historical memory. On the basis of this context, historical memory pheno-menon as a result of collective communication is closely related to the culture. Our analysis shows that relations should be deepened among the Turkic peoples in the modern history. Therefore, the combination of the culture, history and language fields can be possible on the basis of recovery of memory. Here we are, since an-cient times first of all considering "revitalization" of the common and emerging cha-racters for Turkic peoples. First, as the first type of culture, in an oral culture, historical memory is for-med by means of remind and tell. This kind of memory has got more stable content. Such memory is more static. Second, the access in writing culture speeded up the actual role of historical memory. Information began spreading away by the symbols lasted for a long time (alphabet). MMakluyen writes that this process also influenced the human type. Where are the Turkic peoples in this process? Third, in the modern electronic culture (M. Makluyen’ s sense) social function of historical memory plays new different role. Here, the different lines of contacts appear between dynamics of evolution and expression by language. Spreading up the information via the Internet throws back the written memory. Thus, our main hypothesis: the formation of a common language and culture of the Turkic communities plays great strategic importance.