مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,271
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT LAND USE ON THE EMISSION OF GREENHOUSE GASES

Pages

  139-147

Abstract

 An increase in the emission of GREENHOUSE GASES such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) from the soil surface to the atmosphere has been of worldwide concern over the last several decades. Carbon dioxide is recognized as a significant contributor to global warming and climatic change, accounting for 60% of total greenhouse effect. The aim of this research was to determinate the emission of GREENHOUSE GASES from different land under agricultural uses. Four types of agricultural land farm, including wheat field, canola field, citrus garden and fallow land were selected to investigate the fate of CO2 in these fields. Gas chromatography technique and close chamber method were used to analyze soil gas samples. Total carbon losses from soil in form of GREENHOUSE GASES was 4.47, 3.72, 3.38 and 1.89 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 for wheat field, canola field, citrus garden and fallow land, respectively. Total additional carbon to soil from biomass for wheat field and canola field was 4.1 and 4.6 Mg C ha-1 yr-1, respectively. ECB (ecosystem carbon budget)=Ʃ C input -Ʃ C output. For wheat field and canola field ECB was -0.37 and +0.88, respectively. This indicated that in wheat field carbon was lost and in canola field carbon was sequestrated. Under citrus garden due to changes in soil organic carbon form previous year has showed that carbon was sequestrated.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MAHDIPOUR, L., & LANDI, A.. (2010). COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT LAND USE ON THE EMISSION OF GREENHOUSE GASES. WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES), 14(52), 139-147. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/14865/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MAHDIPOUR L., LANDI A.. COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT LAND USE ON THE EMISSION OF GREENHOUSE GASES. WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2010;14(52):139-147. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/14865/en

    IEEE: Copy

    L. MAHDIPOUR, and A. LANDI, “COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT LAND USE ON THE EMISSION OF GREENHOUSE GASES,” WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 14, no. 52, pp. 139–147, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/14865/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops





    Move to top